nikdfish
Veteran Member
2020 Ram 5.7, 17-18 mixed driving (w/out towing) , 14 w/towing in the mix, 11-12 while towing the 7k trailers (car hauler, dump, utility/landscape) w/average loads.
But I bet that Suburban rides much nicer and is more comfortable on such a long drive. It's been a few years, but any Suburu I've driven was not very comfortable, very cramped driving position.When we drive our Suburban to Oklahoma, about 875 miles, we're lucky to get 17-18mpg. When we take the Subaru, we get 34mpg. That's 100% better mileage, or, half the fuel costs. Round trip it's a bit over 100 gallons of gas VS about 50. @ $3.89/gallon = $389 VS $194.
..........
So, if you drive a lot, high MPG vehicles are well worth it. Not so much if you don't put in the miles.
Yes, the 2003 Suburban is quite comfortable. Couch on wheels. However, the 2020 Subaru Outback is quite comfortable as well. The seats are very adjustable, great support, heaters, etc. Plus, the Subaru has Apple Car Play and Subaru EyeSight. Those features make it much less tiring to drive long distances. Overall, while I really like the ride of the Suburban, I'm giving the nod to the Outback for long distance driving. Much easier on the body. I don't have to cram myself in it. I have to move the seat forward to reach the pedals.But I bet that Suburban rides much nicer and is more comfortable on such a long drive. It's been a few years, but any Suburu I've driven was not very comfortable, very cramped driving position.
That's the downside of most high MPG vehicles...you trade comfort and often performance for fuel economy. I'm 73, too few years left to cram myself into some econobox just to save a few bucks on gas.
Anyway...my "fleet";
'02 Dodge Dakota/4.7 4WD: 17
'06 Jeep Grand Cherokee/3.7 AWD: 20ish everyday driving, 24-25 on a trip
Wife's:
'15 Buick Regal AWD (turbo 4 don't know displacement) 28 if she drives, low 30s if I drive.
I find VW Jettas ride and drive pretty comfortable. Certainly better than the Japanese cars of the same vintage that I have driven. A VW Beetle or a Golf is more like a tin box. Fuel economy and performance from a diesel is pretty descent. Gas economy is ok if you keep your foot out of it. Getting in and out of them is harder than a pickup or a mini van but to cram yourself into them is a stretch of the word.That's the downside of most high MPG vehicles...you trade comfort and often performance for fuel economy. I'm 73, too few years left to cram myself into some econobox just to save a few bucks on gas.
Haven't driven a VW in a very long time so I can't comment on them. I was more thinking most Japanese makes, which I've long found to be rather cramped inside.I find VW Jettas ride and drive pretty comfortable. Certainly better than the Japanese cars of the same vintage that I have driven. A VW Beetle or a Golf is more like a tin box. Fuel economy and performance from a diesel is pretty descent. Gas economy is ok if you keep your foot out of it. Getting in and out of them is harder than a pickup or a mini van but to cram yourself into them is a stretch of the word.
I honestly dont know why people rave about these cars, especially the eyesight. Ive found it to be annoying. I had two different rentals long term earlier this year, A Bronco sport and a Jeep Grand Cherokee and both of those vehicles had far better adaptive cruise control than either of the Subarus Ive had since and by a large margin. These Subarus cant modulate speed in hills to save their life, its so obnoxios! The Outback I had did ride nice and was way more comfortable than this Forester but damn was it slow! Forget trying to pass, it was awful. I havent driven anything made in the last 20 years as slow as that car was. All the guys I work with buy the Subi's but I just cant, I ordered another Escape.Yes, the 2003 Suburban is quite comfortable. Couch on wheels. However, the 2020 Subaru Outback is quite comfortable as well. The seats are very adjustable, great support, heaters, etc. Plus, the Subaru has Apple Car Play and Subaru EyeSight. Those features make it much less tiring to drive long distances. Overall, while I really like the ride of the Suburban, I'm giving the nod to the Outback for long distance driving. Much easier on the body. I don't have to cram myself in it. I have to move the seat forward to reach the pedals.
Go testdrive a new 2023 Subaru Outback. If you can, find the one with the turbo. Weeee!!
I haven't experienced any of those problems. The car is able to merge into freeway traffic easily, maintains its speed up and down hills, adaptive cruise works great, passes just fine. Runs along with traffic at 80-90 just fine.I honestly dont know why people rave about these cars, especially the eyesight. Ive found it to be annoying. I had two different rentals long term earlier this year, A Bronco sport and a Jeep Grand Cherokee and both of those vehicles had far better adaptive cruise control than either of the Subarus Ive had since and by a large margin. These Subarus cant modulate speed in hills to save their life, its so obnoxios! The Outback I had did ride nice and was way more comfortable than this Forester but damn was it slow! Forget trying to pass, it was awful. I havent driven anything made in the last 20 years as slow as that car was. All the guys I work with buy the Subi's but I just cant, I ordered another Escape.
Seriously, a Prius gets better MPG than any practical motorcycle. And the tires are less expensive outright, and less expensive per mile.Looks like I better buy that motorcycle![]()
Not sure how many people are paying .10/kWh…. That is cheap!2016 Subaru Outback Limited 2.5i 29.17 MPG, 25,628 miles, 880 gallons.
2016 Yamaha FJR1300A 49.21 MPG, 85,498 miles, 1740 gallons
2018 F-150 XLT 2.7EB 4x4 22.37 MPG, 9,548 miles, 427 gallons
2013 Tesla Model S 85 infinity MPG, 73,848 miles, 0 gallons
Measured from grid the Tesla is using 330 Wh/mile for 24369.84 kWh. At $0.10/kWh that is $2,436.98 or $0.033/mile.
A good price for E10 87 AKI locally is $3.359 which would need over 100 MPG to equal $0.033/mile.
Yup, these EVs are a worthless fad.
I haven't experienced any of those problems. The car is able to merge into freeway traffic easily, maintains its speed up and down hills, adaptive cruise works great, passes just fine. Runs along with traffic at 80-90 just fine.
Took it on one of our trips out to OK a couple months ago. It was great. Going again in a few weeks. Took it to Pittsburg a few months ago as well. Nothing BUT hills out there. Did not experience any feelings of underpower.
Please post a review of your Bronco in a new thread.. We like our 2019 ranger which has promoted us to look at them.I honestly dont know why people rave about these cars, especially the eyesight. Ive found it to be annoying. I had two different rentals long term earlier this year, A Bronco sport and a Jeep Grand Cherokee and both of those vehicles had far better adaptive cruise control than either of the Subarus Ive had since and by a large margin. These Subarus cant modulate speed in hills to save their life, its so obnoxios! The Outback I had did ride nice and was way more comfortable than this Forester but damn was it slow! Forget trying to pass, it was awful. I havent driven anything made in the last 20 years as slow as that car was. All the guys I work with buy the Subi's but I just cant, I ordered another Escape.
But with electric rates at 43c (Hawaii) or even in the low 30s (CA, MA, NH, CT) that math make less sense. Triple or quadruple the electric rate and you are right back back in ICE range.2016 Subaru Outback Limited 2.5i 29.17 MPG, 25,628 miles, 880 gallons.
2016 Yamaha FJR1300A 49.21 MPG, 85,498 miles, 1740 gallons
2018 F-150 XLT 2.7EB 4x4 22.37 MPG, 9,548 miles, 427 gallons
2013 Tesla Model S 85 infinity MPG, 73,848 miles, 0 gallons
Measured from grid the Tesla is using 330 Wh/mile for 24369.84 kWh. At $0.10/kWh that is $2,436.98 or $0.033/mile.
A good price for E10 87 AKI locally is $3.359 which would need over 100 MPG to equal $0.033/mile.
Yup, these EVs are a worthless fad.