Probably because peanuts are a legume whereas nuts are a fruit.
FYI, Peanuts Aren't Even Nuts, And THIS Is How They Really Grow
It's probably not what you think.
By
Julie R. Thomson
10/11/2016 06:00am EDT
The average American eats three pounds of peanut butter a year ― that’s a whole lot of peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. Most of those peanut butter consumers know that the beloved spread is made from ground peanuts, but do you know how those peanuts grow? Have you ever even thought about it?
Peanuts, unlike almonds and walnuts, do not grow on trees. They’re actually not nuts at all, but legumes like peas and lentils ― and they grow in the ground.
Probably because peanuts are a legume whereas nuts are a fruit.
California propositions come from the people (special interest groups). A bunch of signatures and it gets put on the ballet. Then lots of money for scare tactics ads. Spook the sheeple to vote and you get prop 65 cancer warning stickers on everything.
Other places where the bureaucrats and scientists actually know reality make the regulations you get less of this sky is falling labels.
Probably because peanuts are a legume whereas nuts are a fruit.
Peanuts are neither colored or shaped like peas, and do not taste like them or grow above ground like them. They are not a nut either. So we named them peanuts. Silly English language.
Probably because peanuts are a legume whereas nuts are a fruit.
this is getting complicated like LGBT. :confused3:Now you are going to have Ca. renamed "The land of fruits, nuts,and legumes".
Things could be worse, just imagine being allergic to anything peanut, no more PBMJ...............
Things could be worse, just imagine being allergic to anything peanut, no more PBMJ...............
I am allergic to all things peanut. Even things fried in peanut oil.. It isn't all bad, you just have to be careful and sniff anything offered to you. Especially cookies and baked goods. So many people don't understand peanut allergy and continue to offer peanut "things" with abandon. Seemingly unaware that to part of the population they are offering pure poison. Think about that a bit. Say you were immune to a particular poison, but continued putting it in food and offering it in social settings to others knowing full well you would be poisoning them to the extent they might just have a reaction and die right in front of you. It is just a matter of the percentage of the population that can consume this poison. The percentage of the population that can consume the poison and have a reaction is small. And the percentage that will die right in front of you is smaller still. But it is a percentage.
Fortunately most of us can detect the peanut in the product before we stick it in our mouth. About 6 months ago I consumed a cookie offered and being distracted I did not notice it at first. I noticed it in about a minute. But I discontinued consuming, and washed my my mouth and throat out and suffered for about 2 hours. But did not die.I didn't consume enough to puke either, which is what I usually do. BUT thoughtless people still make peanut butter cookies and offer them to people they do not know.
If you were to ask me, you should never make another peanut butter cookie or other bake good that hides the peanut product in other tasty things like the chocolate cookie I was offered and offer them in public. There are just too many people in this world that are poisoned by this product.
I wish I didn't have this allergy, and I am sure millions more wish the same thing.
Oh, i find people in the same room eating pungent peanut butter and raw peanuts in the same room offensive, And while my "detector" is highly tuned, I won't really have a major reaction to the poison, it just irks me. And why some people think that hiding peanut butter in a primarily chocolate cookie is good, I will never know. But some think peanut is good in everything.
Wow James... with all due respect, I find your post a little harsh. While I don’t have a peanut allergy and I can definitely appreciate the seriousness, I find it hard to blame someone for other’s allergies unless they don’t know ‘what’s inside’ if you ask.
My good buddy is seriously lactose intolerant and he always asks about ingredients at a restaurant or when at a friend’s house. Sorry if I am being insensitive but it seems the onus should be on the person with the issue, not the masses that don’t have the knowledge or experience. Expecting everyone to understand a particular person’s allergies is a recipe for failure.
Another friend is highly allergic to squid. He always checks at seafood restaurants about contents of soup, ceviche, etc.
I guess we could pass a law the requires servers to always ask about if anyone has any food allergies? More lawsuits.
I hope you take this right.