MossRoad
Super Moderator
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2001
- Messages
- 58,050
- Location
- South Bend, Indiana (near)
- Tractor
- Power Trac PT425 2001 Model Year
I read somewhere that to make 87 octane e10, they blend 84 octane e0 with ethanol to bring it up to 87.
To get 87 octane e0, they blend 84 octane e0 with 91 octane e0 and get 87 octane e0.
91 octane e0 costs more to produce than 84 octane e0. And ethanol is cheaper to produce than 91 octane e0.
Supply and demand, more people demanding 87 octane e10, than demanding 91 octane e0, makes both 87 and 91 e0 much more expensive than 87 e10. It has little to do with corn at this point.
87 e10 has about 3% less power than 87 e0. So value wise, if you got 87 e10 for $2.00 a gallon, you'd have to be able to purchase 87 e0 for about $2.06 per gallon to get the same value in power/dollar. Until 87 e0 comes within 3% of the price of 87 e10, you're wasting your money purchasing e0.
Before anyone starts thinking I'm a corn fan, forget it. I dislike ethanol as a vehicle fuel. If you look at it entirely on a BTU efficiency level, we'd be better off environmentally and much more efficient if we powered all of our current gasoline vehicles with natural gas, and burned corn for heat in our houses. Then we wouldn't need gasoline at all. Diesel would become much cheaper, too, at that point, because diesel is cheaper to refine from crude oil than gasoline, refineries could do away with more of the expensive gasoline process, and demand for home heating oil would go way down.
Anywho, some things to think about. What would you replace ethanol with to control emissions and keep the current prices of fuel the same?
To get 87 octane e0, they blend 84 octane e0 with 91 octane e0 and get 87 octane e0.
91 octane e0 costs more to produce than 84 octane e0. And ethanol is cheaper to produce than 91 octane e0.
Supply and demand, more people demanding 87 octane e10, than demanding 91 octane e0, makes both 87 and 91 e0 much more expensive than 87 e10. It has little to do with corn at this point.
87 e10 has about 3% less power than 87 e0. So value wise, if you got 87 e10 for $2.00 a gallon, you'd have to be able to purchase 87 e0 for about $2.06 per gallon to get the same value in power/dollar. Until 87 e0 comes within 3% of the price of 87 e10, you're wasting your money purchasing e0.
Before anyone starts thinking I'm a corn fan, forget it. I dislike ethanol as a vehicle fuel. If you look at it entirely on a BTU efficiency level, we'd be better off environmentally and much more efficient if we powered all of our current gasoline vehicles with natural gas, and burned corn for heat in our houses. Then we wouldn't need gasoline at all. Diesel would become much cheaper, too, at that point, because diesel is cheaper to refine from crude oil than gasoline, refineries could do away with more of the expensive gasoline process, and demand for home heating oil would go way down.
Anywho, some things to think about. What would you replace ethanol with to control emissions and keep the current prices of fuel the same?