Share Pics of People Hauling or Towing Something Wrong

/ Share Pics of People Hauling or Towing Something Wrong #7,041  
Don't know. The $36k '36 Ford coupe - flaming red - was simply the most expensive car on a used car lot in Victoria BC. it looked flawless from walking by but the degree of restoration was unknown.

With the cost of restoring and modifying old cars today things like re-chroming, replacement interior and exterior body panels, complete chassis rewiring and electricals, suspension upgrades, brake upgrades, drive train upgrades, body work and paint etc, etc, etc. It doesn't take long to drop 30, 40, 50K or more into a car and that's doing the majority of the work yourself. Ask me how I know.
 
/ Share Pics of People Hauling or Towing Something Wrong #7,042  
With the cost of restoring and modifying old cars today things like re-chroming, replacement interior and exterior body panels, complete chassis rewiring and electricals, suspension upgrades, brake upgrades, drive train upgrades, body work and paint etc, etc, etc. It doesn't take long to drop 30, 40, 50K or more into a car and that's doing the majority of the work yourself. Ask me how I know.

But didn't Mr Cali said he say that '36 coupe restored in '73? Or did I miss read it? Jon
 
/ Share Pics of People Hauling or Towing Something Wrong #7,043  
But didn't Mr Cali said he say that '36 coupe restored in '73? Or did I miss read it? Jon
Yes. We drove up to BC on our honeymoon, that's why I remember the year I saw the '36 on the used car lot. I hadn't seen one in a long time. The one I paid $50 for in 1960 looked like the one in the photo above, faded re-paint but no dents or rust. It would have been worth a little more if it had decent compression. It ran fine but was ready for rings & valves. Back then these were simply 25 year old used cars, like my now daily driver '99 Subaru Outback, except modern cars go a lot longer before they need repairs.

To my eye, even at age 16, the art deco lines of the 30's seemed timeless, classic, like the way a 57 Chevy is recognized today. I later owned a $200 100k miles 57 Chevy wagon, baby blue. I considered that a classic too. Then my sister loaned it to someone who was moving and he crashed it.

I can see spending an unlimited amount to modify a car but how much could it cost to simply restore to original condition, a Ford that cost $695 brand new? If I were doing it today my top choices to represent the art deco era would be (obviously) a '34 Ford, or else a 39 Chev or Ford coupe.
 
/ Share Pics of People Hauling or Towing Something Wrong #7,044  
Yes. We drove up to BC on our honeymoon, that's why I remember the year I saw the '36 on the used car lot. I hadn't seen one in a long time. The one I paid $50 for in 1960 looked like the one in the photo above, faded re-paint but no dents or rust. It would have been worth a little more if it had decent compression. It ran fine but was ready for rings & valves. Back then these were simply 25 year old used cars, like my now daily driver '99 Subaru Outback, except modern cars go a lot longer before they need repairs.

To my eye, even at age 16, the art deco lines of the 30's seemed timeless, classic, like the way a 57 Chevy is recognized today. I later owned a $200 100k miles 57 Chevy wagon, baby blue. I considered that a classic too. Then my sister loaned it to someone who was moving and he crashed it.

I can see spending an unlimited amount to modify a car but how much could it cost to simply restore to original condition, a Ford that cost $695 brand new? If I were doing it today my top choices to represent the art deco era would be (obviously) a '34 Ford, or else a 39 Chev or Ford coupe.

I currently own a 57 2 door sedan delivery wagon that has had a frame off restomod.

But didn't Mr Cali said he say that '36 coupe restored in '73? Or did I miss read it? Jon

You are correct. back in 73 10-15K would have gone a long way to restore a car.

Sorry for drifting the thread way off topic.
 
/ Share Pics of People Hauling or Towing Something Wrong #7,045  
I currently own a 57 2 door sedan delivery wagon that has had a frame off restomod.



You are correct. back in 73 10-15K would have gone a long way to restore a car.

Sorry for drifting the thread way off topic.
I worked a few years for a fella with a fleet of work trucks and a corvette collection (10-15yrs ago). He used to make money hustling corvettes and always had a couple being restored. He told me any car would be 35k to restore so choose one worth more than that when done.

Sorry about my rabbit chasing, but that's what forums on the internetting are good for right?
 
/ Share Pics of People Hauling or Towing Something Wrong #7,047  
Yes. We drove up to BC on our honeymoon, that's why I remember the year I saw the '36 on the used car lot. I hadn't seen one in a long time. The one I paid $50 for in 1960 looked like the one in the photo above, faded re-paint but no dents or rust. It would have been worth a little more if it had decent compression. It ran fine but was ready for rings & valves. Back then these were simply 25 year old used cars, like my now daily driver '99 Subaru Outback, except modern cars go a lot longer before they need repairs.

To my eye, even at age 16, the art deco lines of the 30's seemed timeless, classic, like the way a 57 Chevy is recognized today. I later owned a $200 100k miles 57 Chevy wagon, baby blue. I considered that a classic too. Then my sister loaned it to someone who was moving and he crashed it.

I can see spending an unlimited amount to modify a car but how much could it cost to simply restore to original condition, a Ford that cost $695 brand new? If I were doing it today my top choices to represent the art deco era would be (obviously) a '34 Ford, or else a 39 Chev or Ford coupe.

I was judging the early Ford class at the Napa Silverado Concours and one of the entrants with a beautiful restored Model A Roadster approached me and asked if I has any relation to the man that sold him his car... I said that was my Grandfather.

He paid Grandpa $100 for the car so I just had to look it up... the Model A was traded in on a Chevrolet Pickup and was allowed $75... Grandpa had used tire, oil change and brakes down... the used tire was $2 and the brakes and oil $10... sold it for $100 thereby realizing a profit.

Year later I tried to buy the car but was greatly outbid at the estate sale...

Norm had driven that Model A to Alaska and cross country... not bad for a $100 used car!

He did use the car to haul supplies around the house... said he would carry lengths of pipe "Under" the car and lash them to the front and rear bumpers...
 
/ Share Pics of People Hauling or Towing Something Wrong #7,048  
No clue what this or these are. Ladders? At least he’s got them flagged.
IMG_6463.jpg
 
/ Share Pics of People Hauling or Towing Something Wrong #7,050  
/ Share Pics of People Hauling or Towing Something Wrong #7,051  
No clue what this or these are. Ladders? At least he痴 got them flagged.
View attachment 540349

Wonder if the maximum 2/3 wheelbase limit or 4' max overhang regulations apply?

Dodge Maxivans were the staple for the carpet industry for a long time...

Some of the jobbers used shorter wheelbase vehicles and would get cited for exceeding the California overhang limits... a 7' bed with a 12' roll was common enough.

35410. The load shall not extend to the rear more than two-thirds of the wheelbase.

And as to the red flag, we get this:

LAMP OR FLAG ON PROJECTIONS:
Per CVC Section 24604, whenever the load upon any vehicle extends, or whenever any integral part of any vehicle projects, to the rear four feet or more beyond the rear of the vehicle, as measured from the taillamps, there shall be displayed at the extreme end of the load or projecting part of the vehicle:

a solid red or fluorescent orange flag or cloth not less than 12 inches square, or
during darkness, in addition to the required taillamp, two red lights with a bulb rated not in excess of six candlepower plainly visible from a distance of at least 500 feet to the sides and rear.

Note the "any vehicle" in that one. I suppose that means pickups too.
 
/ Share Pics of People Hauling or Towing Something Wrong #7,052  
The rating has a maximum level of brightness. Does that mean I can hang a lantern that’s not lit from a load?
 
/ Share Pics of People Hauling or Towing Something Wrong #7,053  
I don't know... probably stems from the time when gas and oil lamps were common on vehicles... up to about 1915... I have several vehicles with only carbide or oil lamps...
 
/ Share Pics of People Hauling or Towing Something Wrong #7,055  
I don't know... probably stems from the time when gas and oil lamps were common on vehicles... up to about 1915... I have several vehicles with only carbide or oil lamps...
Perhaps we should pass the hat so that you can afford to upgrade? :laughing:
 
/ Share Pics of People Hauling or Towing Something Wrong #7,056  
Yep... carbide is getting hard to get... something about home land security?

This means home before dark if I want "Good" lights... the oil lamps just don't cut it.
 
/ Share Pics of People Hauling or Towing Something Wrong #7,057  
The rating has a maximum level of brightness. Does that mean I can hang a lantern that’s not lit from a load?
As long as its "plainly visible from a distance of at least 500 feet to the sides and rear"

Aaron Z
 
/ Share Pics of People Hauling or Towing Something Wrong #7,058  
Doesnt stop the cars driving home around here after dark with no lights on whatsoever. See one about every week, on the interstate, very dark, no lights on.
 
/ Share Pics of People Hauling or Towing Something Wrong #7,059  
Doesnt stop the cars driving home around here after dark with no lights on whatsoever. See one about every week, on the interstate, very dark, no lights on.

My favorite are white or gray cars driving during heavy rain or snow storms without lights- almost invisible at times, but I [kinda] see them all the time- usually as a near-miss when they slide by me- seems like the ability to retain traction is coupled with the light switch for some of them...
 
/ Share Pics of People Hauling or Towing Something Wrong #7,060  
My favorite are white or gray cars driving during heavy rain or snow storms without lights- almost invisible at times, but I [kinda] see them all the time- usually as a near-miss when they slide by me- seems like the ability to retain traction is coupled with the light switch for some of them...
I see that all the time around here as well. I'm guessing they can see just fine to drive, and the other cars with their lights on, so it doesn't occur to them that they are nearly invisible behind that curtain of spray being thrown up by the other vehicles.
 

Marketplace Items

2013 KENWORTH T800 (A60736)
2013 KENWORTH T800...
WHISPERWATT 220 DIESEL POWERED GENERATOR (A58214)
WHISPERWATT 220...
1995 CATERPILLAR 938F WHEEL LOADER (A62129)
1995 CATERPILLAR...
Kubota U55-4 (A57148)
Kubota U55-4 (A57148)
2014 Bolens 11A-020W765 20in Push Mower (A60352)
2014 Bolens...
2006 FRAC TANK 500BBL WHEELED (A60736)
2006 FRAC TANK...
 
Top