Mikejeakins
Gold Member
Nice setup.
Another thing now that I think about it, it seems like the operator absolutely must know the maximum pull rating, which is the at the first wrap. That's the number that every other rigging component must be rated at or above. Knowing the rating at the last wrap is well and good, but the other number is necessary for safe operation.
A long time ago I had posted a pic of pallet of wood I had on my FEL and I said it was approximately a 1/2 a cord (it may have been 4/10 a cord). The naysayers on here said it was not half a cord and that a CUT would not lift a half a cord.
My wood splitter came on a really big pallet. So I could safely stack a 1/2 cord on it unlike the other one I had stacked really tall.
So here it is, 6' long, 3' high, and 3 rows of 16'' long/ 48.''
OK. That doesn't cut it - much to general of review. What were your first thoughts when you used them?
OK. That doesn't cut it - much to general of review. What were your first thoughts when you used them?
I see SS guys post that vid quite often...
IF you want to see a REAL comparison between a SS and a TW5, you should have been at the firewood shootout a week ago in Ohio...I was there at the show and watched what happened.
The TW and SS were side by side, with the same kind and amount of wood, and this is how it looked when the TW was all done splitting,
![]()
Two guys on each machine (handing wood to the operator) and you can see what the SS had left, when the TW got finished. In the pict. the TW guys were cleaning off their machine.
Both had a few tough pieces and the TW shoved EVERYTHING right on through, the SS went into bam bam mode and that takes extra time too.
It was a timed event with each machine having someone timing and looking for cheaters, so it was fair... You will be able to read the results in the Dec. issue of Sawmill & Woodlot magazine...
NOW, that's what I call a fair comparison that "I" along with about a hundred plus others, could see for ourselves...
SR