murphy1244
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2011
- Messages
- 16,319
- Location
- Ohio
- Tractor
- Kubota 1120 RTV Kioti DK-40, MF-135, Ventrac 4500Y
I think you get back what you give, at least in many cases That is soooo true.
I don't fully understand why a mfr. making their own engine (their own home grown design) is so important. I mean when I was thinking about buying my LS R3039, I counted it a major selling point that my engine was in tons of other industrial equipment around the world used by other big names in the industry. That told me it was a solid engine and if LS fell off the face of the earth I could still get parts for it. And parts should be cheaper and easier to find. I just can't find fault in that. That was a plus in my book. Anyway, that was my thought process for what its worth (less than 2 cents).
I don't think it is bad to use another manufacturer for the engine. Not at all. That has been a standard practice in trucks forever.
Maybe I'm way off but... It would seem like each engine would be cheaper to build/buy if the cost of engineering a emissions compliant engine were spread over as many units as possible.
The only problem I have with Kioti is the color. In my opinion...choosing to look like a Kubota clone is a mistake for growth. There's a ranch down the road that I've passed at least once a day for the last three years. In that time there's been an orange tractor (usually) sitting next to a barn. I just assumed it was a Kubota. I looked at a job next door to the place last week and much to my surprise, it's a Kioti.
I'm sure I don't know why larger machines that do lots of back and forth don't get HST, but I was mostly wondering about GManBart's comment that the RX had a hydro option.
John, all the good tractor colors are taken. :laughing: