I needed a post hole digger for the bx 24 and a full size cat 1 will not fit on the bx24
Full as in width(at one time Kubota had a narrower hitch that wouldn't accept full cat 1 implements)........not lifting height.And as I said in the other thread, Kubota classifies their BX series as a Cat 1 full 3PH. This leaves that Kubota is playing the same 'deceptive advertising' campaign either by not saying it's a limited, or by not classifying it as a CUT.
go here:I needed a post hole digger for the bx 24 and a full size cat 1 will not fit on the bx24
Full as in width(at one time Kubota had a narrower hitch that wouldn't accept full cat 1 implements)........not lifting height.
Theres the difference
The videos at everything attachments will explain this further if you are still unsure.
Maybe your confused. Kubota never uses the term limited in any of their literature. Therefore they either a) have a Cat 1 hitch, and are now considered a CUT or b) are using a deceptive advertising scheme that shows their product has full cat 1 versatility while they do not. Which is it?
As I stated in another thread, the clearest defining line between the subcut, and the cut, is the lifting height of the 3pt. hitch.
A subcut, generally takes specially made implements to deal with the low lifting height of the 3pt hitch.
The Max series with tires that are 3 inches higher(4 in the case of ags), will allow the use or full cat 1 implenents. Making the Max series a Cut, not a subcut.
That is not the discussion at hand, we are discussing the Mahindra max, and the classification of it as a subcut, when the specs show it as a cut. And the fact that it is unfair to compare to the BX25, which is a subcut.I am also going to speak up about Massey and Kubota adding their power steering pump output to the main hydraulic pump out put to make there GPM output look better. Seems kind of deceptive to me.
read posts more carefully......me thinks you may have missed something.![]()
This is a picture from Kubota's website. Unless I'm blind, I don't see limited.
Looks like false advertising o me, should we as a group look for a strong oak tree to hang the CEO of Kubota for this heinous crime? Or is it that they just define their hitch one way, slightly different than say Mahindra and since there is no governing body to say otherwise, they are well within their rights to call it as they see it?
still not reading posts correcly i see..........This is a picture from Kubota's website. Unless I'm blind, I don't see limited.
still not reading posts correcly i see..........
I'm e-mailing you some glasses so you can read post #163 a little better.:laughing::laughing:It's in here, right? Oops. Kubota deceptive advertising campaign claims a false statement, again? Maybe they are CUTs and Mahindra is fairly comparing!
I'm e-mailing you some glasses so you can read post #163 a little better.:laughing::laughing:
And after reading that.........head on over to everythingattachments.com and do a little research.
Done. Last I checked EA was not related to Kubota, though. So they further prove that Kubota is deceptively advertising their product in a way that will mislead buyer.s