hawkeye08
Elite Member
Dargo, post a pic of the Biscayne... I drove one as a kid and it had the 6 cyl/3 sp... good basic transportation.
Honestly, the more and more I see/read about this 5.0l V8 the more I like it. Yes, I did just say I like a Ford motor.I now know 2 guys with the 5.0 motor and its nice.
Dargo, post a pic of the Biscayne... I drove one as a kid and it had the 6 cyl/3 sp... good basic transportation.
Beautiful car! :thumbsup:
The dyno runs are typically done from a rolling start in a gear as close to 1:1 as possible and not from a stand still. The 5.0l most likely has lower gearing which is why it shows lower rpm's on the dyno vs the V6. They most likely made both runs from about the same speed to full throttle redline.I'm not a dyno expert but why does the V6 data not even start until after 2k rpm's? There should've been some data collected below 2k just like the 5.0.
Did they use the same transmission? Is the converter in the V6 have a higher stall?
Honestly, the more and more I see/read about this 5.0l V8 the more I like it. Yes, I did just say I like a Ford motor.
I'll give it 3 years to prove reliable in a truck but if it does then Ford certainly has a winner. A clean simple NA V8 with that kind of power and economy is great!
If I was to buy a new 1/2 ton i would go with the 5.0 for sure. The v6 sounded like a real winner when people were talking about 25 mpg highway.
I hope it will be a good engine but I bet the 5.0 easily outsells it down the road.
Maybe the tuners can do something for it to get closer to the 25 mpg. The factory tuning does leave a little on the table just to cover a wide spectrum of variables. Good tuners can make a difference.