Dadnatron
Veteran Member
We are looking to build a house this year, and have been working with an architect. We told him our 'goals' and the things we would like included, knowing that we would likely have to adjust everything towards the end.
Our goal was to have a house around 2500sqft, with a Master on main, 2 smaller additional bedrooms (for company not real daily living), an office, and a really good space (loggia/porch) off the back from which to enjoy the view of our property. We are 50yo, so I don't need a lot of 'children space' but wanted it comfortable when grandkids eventually hit the scene. My goal was nice finishes in the home and my budget was to keep it at or below $600K. In my mind, this was completely reasonable and more than what I'd actually like to pay, but I still thought that would far and away get me 'this house' with very good finishes.
The architect came back with 3500sqft great design, with a price of $1M. He said based upon our desired finishes, it would be roughly $300sqft.
Now, I know things are expensive... and I know I can do this much cheaper, going 'cheaper'. But... I really don't see where this $300sqft comes into play. Even if I bumped my budget to $750K, which is far more than I am willing to do, just to get the 'plan', the nature of paying $250K for enhanced finishes, floors me.
I'd like to hear from anyone with experience... builders, etc. I'm back on my heels a bit, after Monday's meeting. When I pushed back and told him I wanted 'this house' on a $600K budget, he seemed peaved a bit, and sent me a lackluster house plan that I really believe I could have found better in a 'blueprints' book.
Am I completely out of the realm of reality? $600K can't build a very nice 2500-3000sqft home? Not looking for gold toilets here.
Our goal was to have a house around 2500sqft, with a Master on main, 2 smaller additional bedrooms (for company not real daily living), an office, and a really good space (loggia/porch) off the back from which to enjoy the view of our property. We are 50yo, so I don't need a lot of 'children space' but wanted it comfortable when grandkids eventually hit the scene. My goal was nice finishes in the home and my budget was to keep it at or below $600K. In my mind, this was completely reasonable and more than what I'd actually like to pay, but I still thought that would far and away get me 'this house' with very good finishes.
The architect came back with 3500sqft great design, with a price of $1M. He said based upon our desired finishes, it would be roughly $300sqft.
Now, I know things are expensive... and I know I can do this much cheaper, going 'cheaper'. But... I really don't see where this $300sqft comes into play. Even if I bumped my budget to $750K, which is far more than I am willing to do, just to get the 'plan', the nature of paying $250K for enhanced finishes, floors me.
I'd like to hear from anyone with experience... builders, etc. I'm back on my heels a bit, after Monday's meeting. When I pushed back and told him I wanted 'this house' on a $600K budget, he seemed peaved a bit, and sent me a lackluster house plan that I really believe I could have found better in a 'blueprints' book.
Am I completely out of the realm of reality? $600K can't build a very nice 2500-3000sqft home? Not looking for gold toilets here.