handcuff
Member
Hey guys,
I have been working with a Kubota B2400 for the last several years, and am finally biting the bullet to step up to a new tractor. I have (had?) selected the new Kioti DK4210se hydrostatic, with an expectation to receive it within the next week or two. The dealer has ordered it and says that he is waiting on confirmation that it has been shipped.
Now my question/problem: I just read the specs (didn't have them available when I made the order) and realized that the PTO HP is less than what I expected. On Kubota, it seems like the hydrostatic trans 'steals' about 5HP from total (thus a 39hp tractor is reduced to ~34HP @ PTO). I assumed that was true of the Kioti also, but it doesn't play out that way -

It looks like the Kioti 42 has about 30HP @ PTO. That was a bit of a disappointment for me, but I don't know if it *should* be...just that I expected it to be in the ~35-37 realm and it ends up being 30. My previous tractor was 18hp to the PTO, and had a bit of a challenge running a 5 ft bush hog. It ran a 4.5 ft tiller and my auger without issue. My new tractor is mostly to get a cab (terrible allergies) and to get more lift capacity (old tractor only had ~800#'s, new one will have ~2,700).
So my question: Now that I've seen this, I question if I should go to the next step up on HP - go for the 4710 (or even the 5210) since the physical size is the same. I don't know if it is 'worth it' to step up in HP, given that the 18HP was doing almost everything I needed. Stepping up an additional 12 HP is a jump of an additional 67%, so my assumption is that it should do everything - but I always hear 'get more than what you expect to need.' Also, I don't know if going to the next size up would cost additional time - they haven't informed him that it has shipped yet, but I don't want to go to the back of the line.
For context, I have 7.5 acres of land that I take care of. 2 acres remain wooded with trails, and 5.5 acres of cleared/used land. I don't have animals except chickens, dogs and my kids. =) I'm in KY where we get some snowfall, but not enough to justify getting a snow-blower. Mostly, I garden, move the chicken coop around, and do a lot of firewood (we heat with it almost exclusively). I'll start mowing the back pasture with the tractor rather than my ZTR Scag once I have it, due to allergies. Front pasture will continue to be mowed with the Scag, because it does a great job of that.
So what are your thoughts? Is 30HP sufficient? Should I be looking at more? I don't know what the cost difference is, but it looks like it's about $1500/jump.
I got the DK because it was large enough for a non-cramped cab, but small enough to still be somewhat nimble on my land. The NX series seemed too large of a footprint; the CK got feedback of 'cramped cab' on several threads.
Thanks for any advice, in advance.
-Scott
I have been working with a Kubota B2400 for the last several years, and am finally biting the bullet to step up to a new tractor. I have (had?) selected the new Kioti DK4210se hydrostatic, with an expectation to receive it within the next week or two. The dealer has ordered it and says that he is waiting on confirmation that it has been shipped.
Now my question/problem: I just read the specs (didn't have them available when I made the order) and realized that the PTO HP is less than what I expected. On Kubota, it seems like the hydrostatic trans 'steals' about 5HP from total (thus a 39hp tractor is reduced to ~34HP @ PTO). I assumed that was true of the Kioti also, but it doesn't play out that way -

It looks like the Kioti 42 has about 30HP @ PTO. That was a bit of a disappointment for me, but I don't know if it *should* be...just that I expected it to be in the ~35-37 realm and it ends up being 30. My previous tractor was 18hp to the PTO, and had a bit of a challenge running a 5 ft bush hog. It ran a 4.5 ft tiller and my auger without issue. My new tractor is mostly to get a cab (terrible allergies) and to get more lift capacity (old tractor only had ~800#'s, new one will have ~2,700).
So my question: Now that I've seen this, I question if I should go to the next step up on HP - go for the 4710 (or even the 5210) since the physical size is the same. I don't know if it is 'worth it' to step up in HP, given that the 18HP was doing almost everything I needed. Stepping up an additional 12 HP is a jump of an additional 67%, so my assumption is that it should do everything - but I always hear 'get more than what you expect to need.' Also, I don't know if going to the next size up would cost additional time - they haven't informed him that it has shipped yet, but I don't want to go to the back of the line.
For context, I have 7.5 acres of land that I take care of. 2 acres remain wooded with trails, and 5.5 acres of cleared/used land. I don't have animals except chickens, dogs and my kids. =) I'm in KY where we get some snowfall, but not enough to justify getting a snow-blower. Mostly, I garden, move the chicken coop around, and do a lot of firewood (we heat with it almost exclusively). I'll start mowing the back pasture with the tractor rather than my ZTR Scag once I have it, due to allergies. Front pasture will continue to be mowed with the Scag, because it does a great job of that.
So what are your thoughts? Is 30HP sufficient? Should I be looking at more? I don't know what the cost difference is, but it looks like it's about $1500/jump.
I got the DK because it was large enough for a non-cramped cab, but small enough to still be somewhat nimble on my land. The NX series seemed too large of a footprint; the CK got feedback of 'cramped cab' on several threads.
Thanks for any advice, in advance.
-Scott