Trev
Platinum Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2002
- Messages
- 918
- Location
- Williamson, NY (near Rochester)
- Tractor
- Currently tractor-less
My wife used to travel a lot, and one thing she keeps noting is how well the Autobahn works. Right lane for slowpokes and trucks, second lane only for passing of the above. The rest of the lanes are free for all.. but people are very considerate and don't hog the left lanes. Very low accident rate.
Now look at Montana.. eliminated the speed limit and fatal accidents went to a record low. Restored speed limit, fatal accidents went to all time high.
Conclusion.. people will drive at a speed they are comfortable with.. and speed limits on limited-access highways tend to cause more trouble than they are worth (not to mention all the time law enforcement officers waste on this.)
http://www.hwysafety.com/hwy_montana_2001.htm
Seems to me like another case of politicians making rules that should be left to the discretion of engineers who have studied the data and understand it.
Another example is the air bag fiasco. Politicians decided that they should protect you at 60 MPH or so. Engineers determined that most fatals occur at 30 MPH or less. So they come out with high-powered airbags that killed some folks, and then listened to the engineers who said look at the data.. they don't need to be that powerful. Now we have the new generation of lower-powered airbags.
Sorry.. just rambling.. /forums/images/graemlins/smirk.gif
Bob
p.s. As Noble Prize Winner Richard Feyman once said ""For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature
cannot be fooled."
Now look at Montana.. eliminated the speed limit and fatal accidents went to a record low. Restored speed limit, fatal accidents went to all time high.
Conclusion.. people will drive at a speed they are comfortable with.. and speed limits on limited-access highways tend to cause more trouble than they are worth (not to mention all the time law enforcement officers waste on this.)
http://www.hwysafety.com/hwy_montana_2001.htm
Seems to me like another case of politicians making rules that should be left to the discretion of engineers who have studied the data and understand it.
Another example is the air bag fiasco. Politicians decided that they should protect you at 60 MPH or so. Engineers determined that most fatals occur at 30 MPH or less. So they come out with high-powered airbags that killed some folks, and then listened to the engineers who said look at the data.. they don't need to be that powerful. Now we have the new generation of lower-powered airbags.
Sorry.. just rambling.. /forums/images/graemlins/smirk.gif
Bob
p.s. As Noble Prize Winner Richard Feyman once said ""For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature
cannot be fooled."