Loadstar
Platinum Member
Too many laws, too many lawyers, hoops to jump through, even simply fishing is getting to be a pita.
So, everyone that doesn't purchase items related to hunting and fishing still get to enjoy the wildlife management that only the hunters and fishers have paid for. Hardly seems fair.
well i have read all the post so far and you know what, everyone has posted a true and important reason why we don't have the intrest of the kids. now how do we fix it ? other than cut the power off.
I have no idea why you would make that comment, my daughter and i have fished sense she aws 3 years old and she's in her late 30's now. what most of the post were saying is the kids don't want to go fishing or hunting, they can find a game that resembles it and don't have to leave the couch. you know the old saying you can led a horse to water but you can't make him drink.>Ask yourself how the kids get the devices.
>Ask who turns on the TV to act as a babysitter.
>Ask who doesn't model expected behavior.
There are many more things to ask. The answer to all can be found in the mirror.
We ate what we bagged.
A lot of people engage in outdoor sports and activities other than hunting and fishing. Since the 1960's things like rock climbing, mountain biking, hiking, bird watching, wildlife photography, snowmobiles, ATV's, para-sailing/hang gliding, snowboarding and alpine skiing have all become huge businesses.
People do get out, and spend a lot of money, just for different pursuits. It is a value judgement to say one's hunting trip is better than someone else's skiing trip.
If the same percentage of a now larger population pursued hunting and fishing as in earlier times, it would drive the participation costs very high. The supply of lands available for that is shrinking. From that perspective, the remaining avid hunters and fishermen ought not to look a gift horse in the mouth. :laughing:
Deciding who pays what for their outdoor recreation is the challenge. In most states, hunting and fishing carries too much of the financial burden of maintaining the wildlife that many others enjoy the use of.
Doing away with regulations would result in a return to the days when wildlife game was all but gone before regulations. For example, I think we would find bear carcasses here in Maine with their paws and bile glands removed because those are worth a lot in the black market trade. There would be no trout left in Maine lakes and rivers were it not for the state hatcheries restocking them every year. Who supports the hatchery and the cost of policing limits, seasons and baits, if fees and regulations are eliminated?
Even at the currently reduced hunting and fishing demand, the natural supply is over-used in many cases.