Rockbadchild
Elite Member
Post 462 says nothing like your interpretation.
You claimed specific cold temperature range losses with no citation of sources, or even knowing what battery was in use. And without citing temperatures.
let me break it down for ya,
the claim
''Bull crap, I have seen first hand the reduction in range in cold weather.''
your answer
''What? Where? When?
Or did you just see it on TV?
What do you know of the battery in the vehicle cited in this thread?
You haven’t stated point blank the EV utility vehicle will have less than half the range in cold temperatures. Based on what evidence? You seem to believe such a statement can be made without evidence, that somehow everyone knows what you say to be true. You are upset that anyone dares challenge your statement.''
'' 'What? Where? When?'' : imply questioning the basis of the claim, skepticism about the source of the observation. It imply that it is only the case for certain battery or vehicle at one point in time... the ''where'' imply skepticism on his observation.
''you haven’t stated point blank the EV utility vehicle will have less than half the range in cold temperatures. Based on what evidence? '': this highlights the absence of specific evidence to back up the claim, suggesting that the claim is not credible without supporting data. Therefore not true.
''You seem to believe such a statement can be made without evidence, that somehow everyone knows what you say to be true.'': You are disputing the idea that reduced range in cold weather is self-evident or universally accepted. This suggests skepticism about the claim being a widely acknowledged fact.
Gezz I wonder why I made this assumption
Post 471 (which you reply to) I posted a scientific paper (maybe you missed it) and stated -20 degree Celsius as temperture.