I can now understand why you didn't like your Norwood BSM, you are comparing it to a completely different class of Woodmizer BSM... Instead of saying the Norwood was junk, you should just say you bought the wrong mill for what you wanted to do.
I am not sure how you can say that. It is a sawmill, and it is supposed to saw logs. Yes, using different means I can make it work, but when other sawmills do not have these deficiencies, then it makes them a better sawmill.
Yes, everything can be attributed to operator error, but if you break a blade because you must back the saw out of a cut because the headrig is located too close to the track, then that is a DESIGN FLAW. And if a company puts on a idler pulley bracket that flexes, it is a DESIGN FLAW. And if a company makes a frame that flexes from logs that it is designed to saw, then it is a DESIGN Flaw.
But other sawmills I have had, have not had these issues. Sure, it can saw lumber, but it takes a lot more effort to do.
Yes, the Norwood is the equivalent of low budget car like the Dodge Neon, but just as a person would suggest a car of the caliber is not worth buying even though it is cheap, so it is with the Norwood Sawmill. For a little more money, a person can buy the Thomas Bandsaw Mill, or a Woodmizer, and have a lot better sawmill that they do not need to fuss with, in order to get lumber from logs.
I have been around sawmills all my life, had a few different types, and even built my own sawmills. I know sawmills, and the Norwood was by far the worst sawmill I ever worked with. My father has the same experience as I do, and he did not like it either.