MadReferee
Elite Member, Rest in Peace
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2003
- Messages
- 3,862
- Location
- New Hampshire
- Tractor
- Kubota B2710, IH TD6-62 dozer with Drott 4n1 bucket loader
There have always been posters who insist that drilling a hole in the ROPS or doing anything to the ROPS will void your new tractor warranty. Based on my investigations (at least for Kubota), this theory is fiction.
Nowhere in the Kubota Warranty Information Guide does it even mention the ROPS. That is a fact.
Warranties typically only cover defects in materials and workmanship. How can drilling a hole in the ROPS for a light fixture void the warranty for say an engine part that fails during the warranty period? The Kubota Warranty Guide specifically says that the warranty does not cover failures CAUSED by unauthorized modifications. Please tell me how drilling the ROPS caused the engine failure.
Liability issues that may arise from drilling the ROPS are an entirely different and seperate issue. Kubota could argue that drilling the hole was an unauthorized modification and deny a claim for all repairs if the ROPS failure caused the damage. There is also the issue of attempting to sue Kubota for damages because of a ROPS failure even though you drilled a hole in it. I think Kubota would cave in rather than going to trial and have engineers testify that drilling the ROPS had no effect.
Comments???
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
Nowhere in the Kubota Warranty Information Guide does it even mention the ROPS. That is a fact.
Warranties typically only cover defects in materials and workmanship. How can drilling a hole in the ROPS for a light fixture void the warranty for say an engine part that fails during the warranty period? The Kubota Warranty Guide specifically says that the warranty does not cover failures CAUSED by unauthorized modifications. Please tell me how drilling the ROPS caused the engine failure.
Liability issues that may arise from drilling the ROPS are an entirely different and seperate issue. Kubota could argue that drilling the hole was an unauthorized modification and deny a claim for all repairs if the ROPS failure caused the damage. There is also the issue of attempting to sue Kubota for damages because of a ROPS failure even though you drilled a hole in it. I think Kubota would cave in rather than going to trial and have engineers testify that drilling the ROPS had no effect.
Comments???
Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night. /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif