Solar - Green?

   / Solar - Green? #11  
From what I understand, every Green Energy type of system out there relies on Federal Funds to make it happen. They never make money, they never break even. When the tax payers stops supporting them, they go bankrupt or just stop operating. California has huge wind farms that are falling apart because it costs too much to keep them running without Federal Funds. I also believe that these Green Energy places are created from lobbyist that make money off of creating these things, which is why they are pushed for so hard.

The day that the technology actually works, the Federal Government wont have to pay for it. As long as the Federal Government pays for old technology that doesn't work, the people making it will continue to sell it.

Is there a single coal or oil based power plant that has been closed and replaced by Green Energy? or do we keep the coal and oil based power plants running because they are reliable and profitable while the Green Energy plants do their thing for awhile, and then close down?

I think that some people confuse home solar systems to the big Federally funded plants and think that they are similar.

The big solar plant in the Mojave Desert requires massive amounts of Natural Gas to warm up the solar cells every morning that costs more then the solar cells generate during the course of the day when they are working. It has never come close to breaking even, and the cost of building it is a total write off.
 
   / Solar - Green? #12  
I thought I would tout a new promising technology that gets energy from the sun in a very different way from solar electric panels. M.O.S.T (Molecular Solar Thermal Energy Storage) combines a photochemical and thermochemical systems that when exposed to sunlight can acquire energy from the sun and store it for up to 18 years using no special technology. In working devices they have exposed the liquid containing the energized molecules to a catalyst and the isomer reverts to its prior state, releasing energy in the form of heat, currently an increase of 63 degrees Celsius (145 degrees Fahrenheit). So if the liquid containing the energized isomer is stored at 70 degrees Fahrenheit, then the resulting heated liquid will achieve 215 degrees. Currently the molecule reacts only to the blue and UV spectrum, though that is expected to widen to adjacent spectrum as the tech improves the scientists expect to see higher temperature output in the foreseeable future and commercial applications in less than 10 years.

My take is a liquid made from off the shelf technologies (no unobtanium involved) that can be easily stored until needed and can provide high heat on demand could be a game changer. A furnace using the liquid could be easily retrofitted to any house heated with hot water. Systems that use the heat to create steam can produce electricity, distill water, all sorts of uses. These days almost any industry that produces waste heat has a plant that captures that heat and generates electricity to power the plant or be sold to the grid.

Solar Storage System Saves Energy for Winter

Macroscopic heat release in a molecular solar thermal energy storage system - Energy & Environmental Science (RSC Publishing)
 
   / Solar - Green? #13  
I'd rather see low to the ground solar installations VS wind farms. At least they don't look as bad. As I travel through the western part of northern Indiana, I can't help but think the wind farms look like cheesy science fiction movies from the 50's. Miles and miles and thousands of wind turbines. Never again will there be an uninterrupted view of the horizon.
 
   / Solar - Green?
  • Thread Starter
#14  
Industrial nightmare?

Compared to what?: Three Mile Island/Chernobyl/Fukushima? Coal Plants? Acid rain-dead lakes (NY has many, partially due to Ohio coal plants). Fracking?

Seem to me I've heard a thing or two about West Virginia (Virginia?) having some mountain top removals for coal. The run-off. Streams contaminated. Slag. You may not like panels, and can argue the economics, their environmental impact (in their use (replacement of other sources) and their manufacturer), effect on grid stability, etc... but I wouldn't call them industrial nightmares. :2cents:

I'm not sure what your point is - Are you saying that since we screwed up in every way you listed, we should'nt worry about what we have left?
 
   / Solar - Green? #15  
Quote---"Is there a single coal or oil based power plant that has been closed and replaced by Green Energy? or do we keep the coal and oil based power plants running because they are reliable and profitable while the Green Energy plants do their thing for awhile, and then close down?" -----

Yes there is... The coal fired electric generation plant in the four corners area of NM is being shut down, replaced by solar and wind generation by PNM (the major utility co.) who owns the plant. It will be an economic disaster for the locals.
 
   / Solar - Green? #16  
...

Is there a single coal or oil based power plant that has been closed and replaced by Green Energy? or do we keep the coal and oil based power plants running because they are reliable and profitable while the Green Energy plants do their thing for awhile, and then close down?

...

The big solar plant in the Mojave Desert requires massive amounts of Natural Gas to warm up the solar cells every morning that costs more then the solar cells generate during the course of the day when they are working. It has never come close to breaking even, and the cost of building it is a total write off.

The US has shut down a lot of coal plants over the last 10 to 15 years. They have been "kind of" replaced by wind. However, the real driver is a huge number of new natural gas plants because gas has become so cheap and they are more flexible to replace the wind plants when the wind doesn't blow.

If you are referring to the SEGS plants in California, they are solar thermal, not photoelectric, so they don't have "cells". The natural gas heats the working fluid (a heat transfer oil) when the solar reflectors don't provide enough heat. This was the original intent so the plant could operate 24 hours a day throughout the year. With the benefit of construction subsidies and low natural gas prices, this particular plant actually made money. However, it does generate a significant part of it's power from fossil fuel.

As an interesting sidelight, it was rushed into production to meet a deadline for "green energy" subsidies. When it started up it leaked the heat exchanger oil, started a fire and resulted in a minor ecological disaster from the oil spill and fire.
 
   / Solar - Green? #17  
I'm not sure what your point is - Are you saying that since we screwed up in every way you listed, we should'nt worry about what we have left?

My point was: On the "industrial nightmare" scale of energy sources, I wouldn't put solar on top of the list.

Don't worry, be happy.....
 
   / Solar - Green?
  • Thread Starter
#18  
My point was: On the "industrial nightmare" scale of energy sources, I wouldn't put solar on top of the list.

Don't worry, be happy.....
Okay, I see. A mountaintop that's carved away is indeed a sad site.

Be happy? I'll try brother.
 
   / Solar - Green? #19  
A few points:

Solar still needs maintenance and repair. People currently working in other industries can retrain and possibly make more money with less risk.

One solution to the solar covering green fields issue is to put the panels over other places. One plan includes covering large parking lots at shopping malls and businesses, panels overhead, parking underneath.

If the cost for home systems was reasonable, I'd go to it in a heartbeat to get away from the local utility and their frequent outages due to poor system grid maintenance.
 
   / Solar - Green?
  • Thread Starter
#20  
A few points:

Solar still needs maintenance and repair. People currently working in other industries can retrain and possibly make more money with less risk.

One solution to the solar covering green fields issue is to put the panels over other places. One plan includes covering large parking lots at shopping malls and businesses, panels overhead, parking underneath.

If the cost for home systems was reasonable, I'd go to it in a heartbeat to get away from the local utility and their frequent outages due to poor system grid maintenance.


Good points! Did you ever consider going to work for your local utility? You should give it a go.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

John Deere 693 Corn Head (A50514)
John Deere 693...
2004 Dodge Dakota Ext. Cab Pickup Truck (A50323)
2004 Dodge Dakota...
2005 MACK CHN613 WINCH TRUCK (INOPERABLE) (A50854)
2005 MACK CHN613...
2015 Ford F-250 4x4 Ext. Cab Pickup Truck (A50323)
2015 Ford F-250...
2013 Case 84in Hydraulic Hopper Sweeper/Broom Skid Steer Attachment (A49461)
2013 Case 84in...
2022 KUBOTA SVL75-2 SKID STEER (A51242)
2022 KUBOTA...
 
Top