Slope Question

   / Slope Question #21  
Land is full of 8-degree slopes with a few steeper ones at 12-degrees.

If I take my time and am not an idiot, would that slope scare any of you?

Answer: NO, not at all.

=================================================================

I encounter steep ground and variations of it every year bush hogging. Decades doing that.

Several comments:
1) I disagree with SDT. Leave the bucket on and run with it low but tip up to avoid snags. You are better ballasted that way and the bucket lowers your c.g. a little. AND traction is better. Mine is definitely more stable with the bucket ON.

2) As Scotty pointed out in a previous post there is a lot of confusion in degrees versus % slope. Here is a graph to clarify that. Being an old helicopter pilot you have seen similar charts before I imagine.

View attachment 550845

This is a high 30's% slope near 40%.

P1160779.JPG

This is a 40% slope.

P1160789.JPG




3) With your 8 to 12 degree slopes there is very little worry unless you stumble into a big hole with the lower rear wheel, etc. 12 degrees is about a 20% slope which is still pretty mild. I mow 40% slopes many times every season without any problems. My limit is about 50%. Anything over 50% does not need to be mowed by me. A 40% slope can safely be mowed with my MF2660 tractor going across it but a 50% slope is too much cross wise for me. My rear tires are set 8' apart at outer edges and it is a low profile (lower c.g.) tractor. I hasten to say I ALWAYS mow steep slopes up/down unless I am boxed in to some momentary cross slope situation. There is no such thing as too much safety margin.

By the way, I know where every ground hog hole and sink hole is in my farm having been over every inch of it since I was in grade school. You need to get very familiar with yours.

4) You may want to hunt up a You Tube video from Penn State Univ. They run a remote control Ford tractor around a hillside every August in their Ag Progress Show and purposely upset it by hitting a hole with the low side rear wheel. I've watched it in person a couple of times and it is impressive.

5) I know a lot of Orange folks don't like me saying this, but the Japanese have thick skulls -- they just cannot seem to understand that many of us operate on steep ground. Most Kubota mid size tractors (40-70hp size) simply do not have the ability to spread the rear wheels apart that they should have. My pasture renter uses an M6040 with 6" spacers on each side and were very uncomfortable until those were installed. The same is true with an L3040 they use. These picts show the spacers installed.
P1020883.JPG and P1180901.JPG

6) Unless you have some compelling reason not to, absolutely run those rear wheels of yours out as far as you possibly can. Try it and gain your own experience of course. If you have any discomfort, add 6" spacers on each side (like the M6040 above) and that will give you a huge margin of comfort on steep hillsides.
 
Last edited:
   / Slope Question #23  
Just thinking out loud here... I only have experience with my little BX24. Looking at it there's a fair bit of steel in the loader arms and mounts - that sit high on the tractor. My _guess_ is that leaving the loader on and low would be about a wash re C of G. Maybe with something in it held low it would help. Maybe.

I'll toss in something learned the hard way: the hydraulics can support rather more than they can lift. Dug a big stump for a neighbor and couldn't quite lift it, but could partially lift it w/chain attached. Dragged it over a nearly invisible change in grade and almost went over when the stump was suddenly in the air. Too soon old and too late smart...
 
   / Slope Question #24  
I don't have much for slopes and have loader on for stumps, etc.

May not be relevant to slopes but I have some deep offs of a couple feet and the loader down low saved my bacon a couple times.

Also I was mowing a field I hadn't mowed before. I discovered a ditch in the middle of it. I started almost level with the loader skidding on the ground on the other side.
 
   / Slope Question #26  
I have a BX2200, which is much smaller, lighter, shorter, and narrower. If I park on the side of a modest slope, I can push on the ROPS and the tractor will lean downhill. I have a lot of respect for working on slopes!

Ron

Agreed completely. My tires are loaded and I can make it lean, but I can't lift a rear tire off the ground. However if I put on the fel and ballast that with 50 lbs of wheel weights and 275 lbs on the 3pt, the FEL still transfers weight forward and I can push of the ROPS and lift a rear wheel with one hand.

What this means practically is that while the fel can be a good emergency brake if things go badly, it is a huge contribution to making things go bad in the first place.
 
   / Slope Question #28  
Agreed completely. My tires are loaded and I can make it lean, but I can't lift a rear tire off the ground. However if I put on the fel and ballast that with 50 lbs of wheel weights and 275 lbs on the 3pt, the FEL still transfers weight forward and I can push of the ROPS and lift a rear wheel with one hand.

What this means practically is that while the fel can be a good emergency brake if things go badly, it is a huge contribution to making things go bad in the first place.

Ray, I respectfully disagree. Your B2230 (and mine) bear little or no resemblance to the M5-111 pulling a 15 ft batwing ! His M5 is over 100hp and over 3 tons. The 15ft batwing is probably a ton by itself. Our little 2200's are ants versus elephants by comparison. The geometry is drastically different. My BX2200 is very easy to get tipsy by lifting too much weight in the bucket, holding it too high with weight in it, and various other dumb things we probably all have done once in a while. My fat butt weight is a significant portion of the total keeping the rear wheels down at times. That's with miniature machines where our body weight is a significant fraction in calculations. Not the case with a 3 tons plus M5. The orig poster (with FEL on it) gets better traction with more weight on the front, lowers his c.g. slightly, makes his whole rig more stable.

I see no circumstance in which his FEL is going to make anything "go bad in the first place" with the large tractor.
 
   / Slope Question #29  
Ray, I respectfully disagree. Your B2230 (and mine) bear little or no resemblance to the M5-111 pulling a 15 ft batwing ! His M5 is over 100hp and over 3 tons. The 15ft batwing is probably a ton by itself. Our little 2200's are ants versus elephants by comparison. The geometry is drastically different. My BX2200 is very easy to get tipsy by lifting too much weight in the bucket, holding it too high with weight in it, and various other dumb things we probably all have done once in a while. My fat butt weight is a significant portion of the total keeping the rear wheels down at times. That's with miniature machines where our body weight is a significant fraction in calculations. Not the case with a 3 tons plus M5. The orig poster (with FEL on it) gets better traction with more weight on the front, lowers his c.g. slightly, makes his whole rig more stable.

I see no circumstance in which his FEL is going to make anything "go bad in the first place" with the large tractor.
Thank you. I suspect most of us responding to this thread with scuts and cuts didn't stop to think how different a machine in that size is. I know I didn't.
 
   / Slope Question #30  
Ray, I respectfully disagree.

And that's your opinion. Every (modern) tractor out there is the same. They have 4 wheels in the 4 corners. Some might have duals. The weights and geometry are different, but the principles are the same. The FEL transfers weight forward. If that weren't happening, nobody would be talking about proper ballast for the tractor, and there are dozens of threads here about ballast.

I am not sure I've ever seen a FEL that lowers the COG to any significant amount. It might exist, but most have a significant portion of the frame and loader arms above the existing COG. The bucket weight would need to be more than the arms.

Whether the slope is problematic for your tractor, your ballast, your width, and yes, even your body weight, is another matter. If you draw these out on paper (and are as skilled with stick figures as I am :D ), the drawings will look the same.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

1985 Corn Husker Hopper Trailer (A50514)
1985 Corn Husker...
Quick Attach Pallet Forks (A47384)
Quick Attach...
2014 Ford F-450 Crew Cab Knapheide Service Truck (A50323)
2014 Ford F-450...
UNUSED FUTURE MINI EXCAVATOR 8" HYD AUGER (A51244)
UNUSED FUTURE MINI...
Noble 8 Row Cultivator (A50514)
Noble 8 Row...
1981 CASE 580D BACKHOE (A51242)
1981 CASE 580D...
 
Top