mwoliver
New member
Hey guys,
I'm just about to buy my first welder and the choices are enough to boggle the mind. I've read so many forum posts and watched so many videos that I've gone beyond the point where I had made up my mind to the point where I'm nearly as unsure as before educating myself. At first I was going to go for a Hobart Handler 140 since I don't have 230V in my garage (yet) and had fairly made up my mind. Then I found this welding forum, and others, and started watching videos on YouTube about different MIG welders from different manufacturers. I was about ready to plunk down the cash for a HTP MIG 2400 machine and run 230V for it. Then I started researching multi-process (MIG/TIG/Stick) machines because I figured that I didn't want to limit myself to just one process when learning. That lead, of course, to more forum reading and more YouTube and more :confused2: about what I really wanted. I want variety of education, for sure, and variety of materials, etc. The variety of materials meant mostly aluminum (for now), and that leads to more questions about whether to do that via spoolgun (MIG or MIG/TIG/Stick machine) or TIG (different TIG/Stick or TIG/Stick/Plasma machine)). For sure I want GMAW/FCAW capability at the very least, but the indecision kills and I'm really ready to stop debating with myself about this and get going.
I have narrowed my decision to a Miller Millermatic 211(i) (probably with a spoolgun) or a Miller Multimatic 200. I know that both will meet my current power supply limitations while allowing me to grow into 230V when available. At this point I am leaning toward the Millermatic 211, even though it's only GMAW/FCAW, because I figure that in the long run I'd rather have a AC/DC machine for TIG/Stick (and perhaps plasma, such as the Everlast PowerPro 256s) so that I could could TIG aluminum (which I couldn't do with the Miller Multimatic 200). I know that it's a little more money in the long run, and the Multimatic 200 is nice(ii), but if variety and education are my goals then it makes sense to me right now to pick up the Miller 211 and get my feet wet with GMAW & FCAW while I bank a little more money for the other machine rather than settling for a compromise in the Multimatic 200.
Opinions and guidance are most welcome and appreciated.
Now that I've written all of that, and calculated that the HTP MIG 2400 isn't that much more $ than the Millermatic 211, I am still :confused2: ...
Thanks,
Mike
i -- I chose the Millermatic 211 over the Hobart 210 MVP because of (probably) better resale if I ever do get rid of it, finer-grained voltage control, reputation (yeah, I know both are owned by ITW) and that the price difference is only a couple hundred bucks.
ii -- I've seen comments about the Multimatic 200 case being a little cheaply made, that it may have been rushed to market, and that the cost/availability of consumables for the (very nice) Bernard Q150 gun weigh slightly against this machine (for me).
I'm just about to buy my first welder and the choices are enough to boggle the mind. I've read so many forum posts and watched so many videos that I've gone beyond the point where I had made up my mind to the point where I'm nearly as unsure as before educating myself. At first I was going to go for a Hobart Handler 140 since I don't have 230V in my garage (yet) and had fairly made up my mind. Then I found this welding forum, and others, and started watching videos on YouTube about different MIG welders from different manufacturers. I was about ready to plunk down the cash for a HTP MIG 2400 machine and run 230V for it. Then I started researching multi-process (MIG/TIG/Stick) machines because I figured that I didn't want to limit myself to just one process when learning. That lead, of course, to more forum reading and more YouTube and more :confused2: about what I really wanted. I want variety of education, for sure, and variety of materials, etc. The variety of materials meant mostly aluminum (for now), and that leads to more questions about whether to do that via spoolgun (MIG or MIG/TIG/Stick machine) or TIG (different TIG/Stick or TIG/Stick/Plasma machine)). For sure I want GMAW/FCAW capability at the very least, but the indecision kills and I'm really ready to stop debating with myself about this and get going.
I have narrowed my decision to a Miller Millermatic 211(i) (probably with a spoolgun) or a Miller Multimatic 200. I know that both will meet my current power supply limitations while allowing me to grow into 230V when available. At this point I am leaning toward the Millermatic 211, even though it's only GMAW/FCAW, because I figure that in the long run I'd rather have a AC/DC machine for TIG/Stick (and perhaps plasma, such as the Everlast PowerPro 256s) so that I could could TIG aluminum (which I couldn't do with the Miller Multimatic 200). I know that it's a little more money in the long run, and the Multimatic 200 is nice(ii), but if variety and education are my goals then it makes sense to me right now to pick up the Miller 211 and get my feet wet with GMAW & FCAW while I bank a little more money for the other machine rather than settling for a compromise in the Multimatic 200.
Opinions and guidance are most welcome and appreciated.
Now that I've written all of that, and calculated that the HTP MIG 2400 isn't that much more $ than the Millermatic 211, I am still :confused2: ...
Thanks,
Mike
i -- I chose the Millermatic 211 over the Hobart 210 MVP because of (probably) better resale if I ever do get rid of it, finer-grained voltage control, reputation (yeah, I know both are owned by ITW) and that the price difference is only a couple hundred bucks.
ii -- I've seen comments about the Multimatic 200 case being a little cheaply made, that it may have been rushed to market, and that the cost/availability of consumables for the (very nice) Bernard Q150 gun weigh slightly against this machine (for me).