MossRoad
Super Moderator
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2001
- Messages
- 58,117
- Location
- South Bend, Indiana (near)
- Tractor
- Power Trac PT425 2001 Model Year
That certainly is a concern!
You are correct to point out that he who pays the piper,calls the tune, but traditionally there has been a
level of privacy between doctor and patient that I fear will be eroded over time.
The government wants to know you had a cold? I doubt that. If the government ends up administering the health care system, they may want to know if you actually received treatment for it so they can pay for it, but I doubt they will care if you had a cold.
Look, people with the means can currently afford health care. People without the means cannot. So do we that can afford it let those that cannot suffer? Most of us answer NO to that question. Then the dilemma begins: how do we raise up the people that don't have the means or the skills or even the capacity to get the means? Private insurance isn't going to cut it for those that cannot afford it. Some form of socialism in health care is needed to take care of those that can't afford it. You morally cannot let poor or even lazy people suffer. What are you going to do with them? There are millions of them in this country. They are all our problem and if you don't do anything about them, they become a bigger problem because they multiply. Private industry is not going to take care of them because there is no profit in it. That leaves we the people to take care of them. Government is going to have to step in. We are going to have to step in. If there is total privacy, no one will be able to step in and question anyone about their choices as to their health decisions. Someone in charge has to know the facts in order to treat the condition and pay for it. And someone in charge has to know where the money is going, the health trends to develop preventions, planning for future capacity, etc...
gotta go