Bird,
I think Weir is a man of principle, and in that sense is a good guy. Rather then cheapen his product or off shore, as walmart wanted and expected him to do, he chose to make the incredibly difficult decision to no longer continue to sell to the worlds largest retailer. That took guts on a major level.
The "fluff" the story about the seating and the like, is just that fluff. Basically its there to illustrate walmarts quest for low cost, be it in their stores or head office. To me, it also shows that sometimes there is more than just low cost to be considered. Its how you present yourself. Frankly, i think that having lawn furniture as seating, in the head office of a multi-billion dollar operation is being frugal to the point of being foolish. Which is also partly the meaning of the article.
I understand walmart's offer to increase their purchase of Snapper products was unexpected, and I'd be sweating too if i was just going to drop walmart as a customer. That could ruin your career and your company. I think that he went there because like myself, Mr Weir prefers to conduct his business in person, at least in this case,
Weir said he respects walmart, and has adopted their practices regarding inventory and production, however they still conduct business in a "fair" manner. Fair to his employees, his companies history and their independent retailers. Theres nothing wrong with being lean as long as its fair.
Read johndeere4300's previous post. Walmart respects the unions in china, and gave raises, social security,paid vacation and overtime, yet they close stores to break the unions here in Canada. Also notice how walmart's salaries in the states havent kept up with inflation.
As a taxpayer, your subsidizing walmarts low wages through the government assistance that their employees require.
When walmart came to canada (they bought the established woolco chain) they promised to source most of their products in Canada, and by extension the US. They did keep their word for a while, now its nothing but imports. And we wonder why were losing jobs left and right?
No one can deny Walmart has been successful, but the issue is, success at what cost?