ronjhall
Super Star Member
Never realized how bad many drivers are at merging until I bought a RV. An awful lot of people must not have taken a driver training course. :confused2:
We have a 6 mile stretch of '95 in Bangor with a LOT of merging traffic. Speed limit is 55. I bump the speed to 60 and stay in the left lane unless traffic volumes are low. Doesn't make for any friends, for sure, but I don't care. My job is to keep all four corners on my truck and make sure all the yahoos make it home alive.
Yeah, law says they will yield, but I'm not trusting them with my driving record. Someone blamed the police, but it's a lost cause at this point. I look at this this way, there are 900,000 licensed vehicle operators, and a whole lot more unlicensed I'm sure, here in Maine. Me, or all the law enforcement in the state, will never teach them laws or good sense. It's far easier, and safer, for me to adapt.
I'm not saying that's the "correct" answer, but it's the answer for me. In a fail to yield incident, yeah, they were wrong by law, but THE DRIVER was wrong for allowing to happen. We are the professionals.
I'm at 1.6 million miles, so something must be right.![]()
I learned a pretty safe trick to that one. As the slow driver youre behind merges you accelerate and pass in the merge lane and merge ahead of them. No problem with traffic coming from behind.Totally agree with skyco about slow cars. The freeway speed is 70 where I am at and I kid you not, some lady was in front of me a couple days ago (and a number of cars were behind me) and managed to get up to a whopping 40mph as she merged. So now you have 5 or 6 cars trying to get on a busy freeway all doing 40. Just awesome way to get someone killed. I haven't been that mad in a long time.![]()
Yeah, aint it the truth. Much law exists in a headupusbuttus condition. I have hope that an intelligent officer would see the balance of the specific situation and deal a stern warning with amusement. I have done it many times from 1st following vehicle position. With good power available it is much safer than following the legal constraint. :confused3:Of course, if a cop sees you do it, then you get a ticket for improper lane usage and the slow merger gets to keep a "clean" driving record....
I learned a pretty safe trick to that one. As the slow driver youre behind merges you accelerate and pass in the merge lane and merge ahead of them. No problem with traffic coming from behind.
larry
European law is the opposite: Anyone in the right lane HAS TO allow someone coming down the on ramp to enter the right lane. The vehicle on the on ramp has right of way. If you cut someone off, it will cost you your drivers license.
The result is that people do not merge so fearfully and actually speed up as they go down the on ramp.
This particular issue was the single biggest "culture shock" item I experienced when I moved to the US in 2003. It seemed that everyone, no matter what they were driving absolutely 100% had to speed up so that they could cut you off when you were trying to merge, including semi drivers. It seems a national past time to see who can out accelerate each other in doing this. I personally think it is the primary reason why Americans favor big motors (dragsters), since the speed limit is otherwise 70 or in a very few states 75mph on the interstates. Go to Europe and many autobahns allow unlimited speeds yet most people drive cars with engines half the size. Can you imagine what would happen in germany with people doing 130 to 170mph and not yielding to someone trying to merge in the right lane ? Carnage is the word and they have known that for a long time.
It is long overdue that this stupid law be changed here in the US to give right of way to the "weaker party" (the one merging) and those already on the highway simply have to plan ahead when they see a merging lane coming up.
Perhaps you dont. In most cases any other action is less safe. The only alternatives I see are stopping on the acceleration ramp, or mergiing into a highway lane that is in a disturbed slowdown mode behind the slow merger.Not something I would advise, or admit I had done...if I understand you correctly.
David from jax