Buying Advice Much time looking, down to the last question

/ Much time looking, down to the last question #1  

GuadGrassfed

New member
Joined
Mar 14, 2014
Messages
12
Location
Guadalupita, NM
Tractor
Ferguson TO-30, Kioti DK55
After using TBN for many years to read up and educate myself on tractors, I have finally gotten on board with my first post. I'd like to thank the hundreds of people whose contributions I've read and researched that have greatly benefited me. Its been like a college course on equipment: how to evaluate, size, maintain, use and purchase the right machine. Its a gold mine of information!

I'd like to think that my situation is slightly more complicated than average. I have a small ranch by western standards but of course we don't have very much dry-land farming here so we don't need to plow or mow. I run livestock and they eat grass that gets banked over the summer and is fully used-up over the winter. My tractor needs are for fence-post holes, modest road maintenance, handling round bales, plus some brush clearing and assorted FEL chores. The land is reasonably level for being in the mountains, elevation is about 7200', although I have read all the posts about how to make you machine more stable and less prone to rollover since we have plenty of incline (over 500 feet in a quarter section in places), and I plan to use loaded R-4s since its rarely muddy here and I like the lower profile.

My requirements lead me to look at the medium to large utility tractors: Kioti DK55, Kubota MX5100, the Deere 5000 series, etc. No need for cab, it's usually sunny all winter :thumbsup: My bottom-line list of "must-haves" are: 50hp machine (with matching loader for say 2500# lift at the pins), 4WD, TURBO (primarily for altitude compensation - at 7000' I'm giving up over 20% of my hp without it), and possibly HST since I think its advantages match my average use better than gear (though I don't have any issue with using a gear). I'd guess my average use per year might be 150-200 hours.

The last major item is The Dealer, and you can imagine it is sparse around here. I read on TBN where people have every dealer within 15 miles of their place: here its about 250 miles. It turns out that one of my closest dealers (80 miles and over a 10,000' mountain pass) is the one I prefer: long-time record of customer satisfaction, small town, wants the business (not lots of it here), knows how to deal with customers located far away. The dealer has therefore lead me to consider his brand quite strongly: Kioti. Luckily, I think Kioti appears to stack up rather well (thanks TBN for the info).

Therefore, I am faced with the fact that the Kioti line doesn't have much turbo. The DK55 is probably the best choice (I think?) but it doesn't have HST, just gear. I'd really like to buy Kioti although Deere and Kubota and possibly others have this rare combo: 4WD, turbo, 50hp, and HST ($$$). Mahindra, LS, TYM and others don't seem to have the same combination of these features. Kioti isn't perfect, but its just the tranny choice, the rest seems to line up. OR, I can chuck my strongly-held beliefs about turbo and altitude and get a DK50HST. Price differences between these two choices not significant to me.

Another thought I haven't seen written about: is hydraulic performance impacted by reduced HP of a naturally-aspirated engine at altitude, or would the tractor continue to pump out the same GPM with understandably reduced power for pulling and PTO chores? That might lead me to go to the naturally-aspirated HST all else equal.

So, my dilemma is to either forsake my goal of a turbo machine and get the Kioto HST -- or get a geared turbo model (DK55 presumably only choice) and just get good at running it. I'm mid-50s and the legs are still OK, but i certainly understand the point of view expressed here that the clutch can be a pain as you get older:eek:. Thanks in advance for any advice you might share-- recognize there is no objectively right choice but its still quite helpful to hear educated opinions.
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question #2  
Performance is a relative term, but at reduced horsepower, your flow rate may not be quite as good, but your pressure developed in the loader cylinders will still be the same, as that is a function of the Pressure relief valve. It may have slightly reduced response, in other words, the cylinder may not extend quite as fast, but it will still pick up the same load. I doubt the difference would even be all that noticeable. I think hill climbing with loads might be more noticeable. But the DK50se is the same basic tractor as the DK40se with 10 more horsepower. So you are starting with a stronger engine to begin with.
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question #3  
What about an RX6620 power shuttle? Go up in HP to compensate for altitude. Power shuttle reduces clutching. Looks like a really nice tractor to me.
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question #4  
Another thought I haven't seen written about: is hydraulic performance impacted by reduced HP

2000 rpm is 2000 rpm the hydraulics will be the same but cost HP to get there. Get the DK 50.
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question #5  
Another thought I haven't seen written about: is hydraulic performance impacted by reduced HP
2000 rpm is 2000 rpm the hydraulics will be the same but cost HP to get there. Get the DK 50.
Yes, with reduced HP using the hydraulics will have a greater impact on the engine (ie: lifting the loader and holding the lever until it goes into relief would bog the engine down more than at a lower altitude).

Aaron Z
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question #6  
I'm there with you at the mid-fifties age and haven't yet lamented having a shuttle. If you stay with the Kioti brand ( good choice in my biased view), given having to choose between more power and HST, I'd take the power.
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question #7  
What about an RX6620 power shuttle? Go up in HP to compensate for altitude. Power shuttle reduces clutching. Looks like a really nice tractor to me.

Good advice and with the grade you describe you would be much happier with the power shuttle.
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question
  • Thread Starter
#8  
Appreciate the opinions thus far. I may price the RX (although its full Tier 4 - not sure I wanna be first). I can see that I am going to need a large silver dollar for the coin toss...
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question #9  
I'd look hard at LS U5030, no turbo but a full 3.3l machine. All the right stuff, Mitsubishi engine s4s is unapproachable. HS
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question
  • Thread Starter
#10  
Looking at the U5030: it is a turbo machine. Awesome specs, considering.
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question #11  
Not sure about the deere you mentioned, but it seems that the mx5100 would be a great choice. Lots of satisfied owners here. I love my mx4700. I test drove a dk when I was shopping, and it was nice, but I didn't care for the switch activated 4wd or PTO. I'd rather have the levers of the MX series. Also, the price must be pretty close, I'm guessing the MX is a bit more, but in my opinion it's worth the difference.

I know there's a ton of satisfied kioti owners here, and I almost became one. After driving both, I chose the Kubota. They've been around a long time, they hold their value, and I like that it says "made in Japan" on it. I've heard it said that kiotis are like Hyundai's to Kubotas Honda. If that's the case, you can get a great tool for a great price with a good warranty in the kioti. Or you can get a product with the best name recognition (resale $), great dealer network, and a decades old track record of being a top performer and innovator in the industry. And it's made in Japan, not Korea.

At the beginning of your post, you said that a hst, turboed, 50hp tractor was your "must-have". The MX is that tractor at a great price. Then you say you're almost convinced to get a kioti, which doesn't offer a tractor that fits the bill.

I'm not familiar with the ls mentioned, but buying the rx 6620 just to compensate for not having a turbo seems backward to me. Your paying for HP you'll never get to use. And paying for a full tier four machine. The mxs are interim, so no dpf.

Good luck and keep us posted.
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question #12  
Having just completed placing quite a few 6" posts with a PHD on my Kioti, I can tell you that I would not have enjoyed having to fight a non-HST machine to get my posts lined up. Also, having the ability to raise-lower the PHD from behind the tractor was a real benefit.
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question #13  
A power shuttle and foot feed moves hay bales quicker and with less fuel than the DK 45 HST, but for heavy digging nothing beats the HST
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question
  • Thread Starter
#14  
Not sure about the deere you mentioned, but it seems that the mx5100 would be a great choice. Lots of satisfied owners here. I love my mx4700. I test drove a dk when I was shopping, and it was nice, but I didn't care for the switch activated 4wd or PTO. I'd rather have the levers of the MX series. Also, the price must be pretty close, I'm guessing the MX is a bit more, but in my opinion it's worth the difference.

I know there's a ton of satisfied kioti owners here, and I almost became one. After driving both, I chose the Kubota. They've been around a long time, they hold their value, and I like that it says "made in Japan" on it. I've heard it said that kiotis are like Hyundai's to Kubotas Honda. If that's the case, you can get a great tool for a great price with a good warranty in the kioti. Or you can get a product with the best name recognition (resale $), great dealer network, and a decades old track record of being a top performer and innovator in the industry. And it's made in Japan, not Korea.

At the beginning of your post, you said that a hst, turboed, 50hp tractor was your "must-have". The MX is that tractor at a great price. Then you say you're almost convinced to get a kioti, which doesn't offer a tractor that fits the bill.

I'm not familiar with the ls mentioned, but buying the rx 6620 just to compensate for not having a turbo seems backward to me. Your paying for HP you'll never get to use. And paying for a full tier four machine. The mxs are interim, so no dpf.

Good luck and keep us posted.

motownebrown: You are right, I think the MX5100 perfectly meets my specs, its just that the dealer is another 100 miles away so I am trying to balance spec perfection with what I perceive to be a better place to buy and maintain. Thanks for your input and I will keep the thread posted.
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question #15  
Gotcha. That makes perfect sense. I do like the fact that my dealer is only ten miles away. Many people on here have traveled a long way to buy what they want, but having the dealer close by is reassuring. Either way, at least drive as many as you can to help you make your decision. Good luck.:)
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question #16  
I can not imagine living above 7000 ft elevation and owning a diesel without a turbo on it. :eek: Everything about that would be a disappointment in my mind. You will have a sluggish machine without a turbo, best to be prepared for that if you go that way.

IMO, a power shuttle is every bit as good as an HST, maybe even better in my mind, but that is just me. Don't rush into anything and be sure to figure out all the pros and cons of the units that you look at. ;)
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question
  • Thread Starter
#17  
These are all excellent ideas and opinions, thanks.

Especially glad to hear from MtnViewRanch who I've seen on practically all turbo posts. I sat down and laid out the numbers: The DK55 is a 54HP machine that produces 45hp at the PTO, and with turbo I retain all that HP. The DK50SE-HST is a 49HP machine that produces 37.5 HP at the PTO, but due to altitude I can only use 30HP, a 21% reduction from sea level...I guess that's why I have been so hard-over for turbo and therefore I think the transmission is going to have to take a backseat. Going to call the dealer this week and get some price negotiations going on the DK55.

Thanks again for the ideas and opinions.
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question #18  
Just wondering how this finally played out. Any updates?
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question
  • Thread Starter
#19  
Thanks Pappy. This thread really helped me get my priorities clear in my mind, thanks to all who shared. In the end, it was HP at altitude and dealer over HST. The MX5100 was a very close runner-up but just a bit too far away and more $$.

Just made a deposit on the DK55 earlier this week (!) -- the tractor is coming from a few states away as I understand we are getting down to the last available stock. I won't be able to take delivery for a few weeks due to delivery/prep and a long-ago scheduled trip :hissyfit:

When I get it I will definitely post pictures!

With the tractor I am getting rimguard, a sunshade, bale spear and a post-hole digger. I have an old box blade that I will try to use instead of going new.

My first projects are 1) unloading some round bales 2) working on the farm roads that are rutted and need material and 3) putting in a few more large fence posts (RR ties). If the rains come this summer, I am going to try some basic pasture renovation just using a disc and some hand seeding in a few areas to see how that works.
 
/ Much time looking, down to the last question #20  
Sounds great. Congrats on the new DK55. :thumbsup:

And, yes, pics are required in order to maintain your status as a member in good standing. ;) :laughing:
 
 
Top