kennyd
Advertiser
What the tech said is technically correct, setting it up with PB is the best way. But, OTOH...it was working fine before and it should work fine now. The addition of the PB circuit will NOT give anything "more power".
I dont think that either....the thing ist that we do not know at what rpm pump is rated for 6.2gpm....and we do not know yet at what rpm captjack runs his system during the "test".....if pump is rated 6.2 at 1800rpm, and he test at 600rpm.....flow is almost down to 2 gpm...compared to 10gpm.... now we have a difference....I personally do not believe the difference between 6.2 GPM and 10 GPM makes a hill of beans of difference in this case.
I agree that an over sized valve will do the same job, as long as we allow this over sized valve operate with a fully closed center (lever at max stroke)PLENTY of peaple plumb in 25 GPM valves on small tractors and equipment because they are cheap (the valves that is), smaller valves usually cost more.
Get a IR thermometer and do some testing...I still think that valve may be bad/wrong-possibly it was mis-packaged or labeled, where did you get it from?
Agree with kennyd....If entire pump flow is forced through your new valve, there should be NO extra benefit with the PB plumbing....So you don't think I will see a difference in performance in the loader and three point by plumbing it correctly ?
I am ignorant when it comes to hydraulic flow. There has to be some advantage to using the PB set up when installing the loader.
Right ?
ps AKKAMAN - according to Brand the valve closes the center the min you move the lever