DocDiesel
New member
I decided to run some numbers. Assuming you plan on keeping your tractor for 30 years (which hopefully yours will last), you are paying less than a dollar a day more for a Deere a Kubota. For a tractor that YOU have admitted has better ergonomics, more features, and better engineering it seems like an extremely small price to pay. I know where I'll be in 30 years, and I know for sure that if I'm lucky enough to still be able to be tractoring, I won't have to worry about something as small as fumbling over a brake pedal on accident that can turn into a nasty spill. Sure if you plan on keeping your tractor for 30 days, it won't make much sense, but that's why they have rental companies. The price you pay for all the extra features of the premium brands is extremely minimal for those of us who use our tractors frequently and keep them for a long time.
I have also liked to see how hypocritical you are. You are nagging me for 'ducking' questions, but when arlen points out SIX out of many reasons that a Deere is superiorly designed and engineered you reply to only ONE of those reasons and cite that as the ONLY reason to spend an extra $9k on a much superior product. You are showing your true colors. I'm starting to believe you are understanding the price difference and why we choose the better, more economical in the long run product, but now you're just trying to protect your manhood on an inferior product.
I have also liked to see how hypocritical you are. You are nagging me for 'ducking' questions, but when arlen points out SIX out of many reasons that a Deere is superiorly designed and engineered you reply to only ONE of those reasons and cite that as the ONLY reason to spend an extra $9k on a much superior product. You are showing your true colors. I'm starting to believe you are understanding the price difference and why we choose the better, more economical in the long run product, but now you're just trying to protect your manhood on an inferior product.