jcmseven
Veteran Member
One thing not mentioned here is that the torque difference between the two is pretty large. I have not looked it up recently, but I recall the 2520 having 51 lb. feet of torque and the 2720 having well over 60 pound feet. I want to say the difference is around 12-14 lb. feet, which is substantial in these sized machines, especially having two range hydrostatics. I have professed and still feel all of the 2000 series machines are priced too high for the features they offer (I have a 2320 right now), but I feel with the tasks you mention--which benefit from the extra torque--going with the 2720 would offer a noticeable benefit.
John M
John M