SPECIFICATIONS
* Disp. 0.43 cu. in. / rev.
* Pump Type Variable piston
* Rotation CCW
* Pressure:
1425 PSI cont.
3500 PSI int.
* Speed:
600 RPM min.
3600 RPM max.
* Flow per Pump(fully stroked):
6 GPM @ max. speed
* Mount 4 bolt 108mm X 145.5mm c.c.
* Shaft 15mm tapered w/keyway and
10mm-1.5 LH threaded end
* Control Shafts 12mm dia. x 15mm
w/dual flats and pin holes
* Rqd. Filtration Input to charge pump
* Oil 10W-30 or 15W-40 engine type
* Inlet Port SAE 8
* Work Ports SAE 8
* Drain Port SAE 6
* Size 7-1/2" x 5-1/4" x 7"
* S
hpg. 17 lbs.
A couple of things to consider.
I could not view the specs sheet but in reading through the description they where talking about a charge pump and filtration requirements so it makes me believe you would need a remote reservoir. Not sure what the flow rate is on the charge pump.
Since these are designed to run motors you would have to use double rod cylinders to get equal flow rates and not exceed charge pump capabilities.
Good points from everyone... thanks for the replies. This was my thinking on some of the points you guys made:
1) The description says "Rqd. Filtration: Input to charge pump". I read this as the pump has an integrated charge pump that requires a filter in front of it. Considering the original intended use of the pumps (really cheap zero turn mower... It would have to be a really cheap mower to use wheel motors with a matching small displacement to the pump). I can't imagine a cheap mower requiring a separate external charge pump. That wouldn't fit with the economics of the pump. The pump inspires a mental picture of a 18hp Craftsman ZTR with a 30" deck for $2000.
2) Double rod cylinders - Yes this makes a lot of sense. A single rod cylinder would have different displacements on each side causing different flow rates. Interesting thought on how much displacement/flow differential you could get away with? How much the charge pump could make up and still operate with some kind of life expectancy?
3) Set the swash plate and use it as a fixed displacement pump. This could definitely be done but is kind of counter to what I was hypothesizing about. I was envisioning a trailer hitch back hoe with an old lawn mower engine and a couple of these pumps. Plumb the pumps directly to the cylinders... no valves... very simple. I was imagining a bypass valve between the two sides of the pistons to short the flow at the end of the cylinder cycle. I really liked the idea of making the variable displacement a feature. Move the swash plate a little to move the bucket slowly... move the swash plate a lot to move the bucket quickly.
4) The biggest concern I had was about heating of the hydraulic fluid. But the pumps are probably really designed for closed loop operation anyway. Some sort of inline cooling would probably be a good idea though for any kind of life expectancy.
5) Hydraulic reservoir: I hadn't considered there would be any way to get around having some sort of reservoir. Something to supply the charge inlet and a place for the overflow to drain. Considering the closed loop operation the tank wouldn't have to be very big.
6) May want to consider installing a fan like most small HST's have. Yep! Definitely! Another great idea I hadn't thought about!
7) Would there be leakage between the two sides of the pump when the swash plate is in the neutral position causing the bucket to slowly lower instead of keep its position?
I am not ready to run out and build a mini back hoe using these pumps. I just saw these and saw the price and it got my wheels turning. I needed some input / reality check of my idea. I knew this was the place to come for some intelligent input. The volume differential of a single rod cylinder makes sense... but I still wonder if it would be a show stopper?