hydrostat vs gear hp loss

   / hydrostat vs gear hp loss #81  
Ok.. could be...an air/pump issue.. been so long I couldn't remember... whoever... it begs looking at another neat fact... Had that been a gear tractor.. it would (may.. traction dependent.. )have crawled out.. even if the gears weren't running in oil.

Soundguy
 
   / hydrostat vs gear hp loss #82  
Well, what I got from the thread was; he hooked up a new log splitter, didn't make sure the fluid was back to full, and backed down a steep hill. In his post where he said the tractor was out, he said the dipstick read "a hair" above. After putting in all that fluid, is sounds like he went down the hill quite low on fluid.
 
   / hydrostat vs gear hp loss #83  
A friend of mine discoved what he now considers to be a very important advantage of hydro over gear. Last week he was clearing some land down near the river. He was using a Kuboto with a fel. I haven't had a chance to speak with him directly, and what I have heard has been heersay, and what was published in the local paper. It seems he managed to flip the tractor on its back and then rolled it on its side. He was trapped underneath the rear wheel. He said the tractor ran for a loooong time, it finally cut off when the oil flooded the engine. It smoked and snorted and just kept running for what seemed like an eternity. His arm and shoulder were pinned underneath the rear wheel. He was able to get his pocket knife and dig out enough space under his body to enable himself to scratch and claw with his finders to dig enough of a hole to make clearance to slid himself out from under the wheel. It took him almost four hours to get out from under the tractor. He then walked to a nearby house about a mile away. He was very lucky. His worst injury was a broken collar bone. He said that if he had been using a gear drive tractor, the wheel would have just chewed him up and spit him out. He was very grateful that since it was a hydro, the wheels stopped turing when he fell off. He learned several lessons that day, many of which he had forgotten in his 40+ years of driving tractors.
 
   / hydrostat vs gear hp loss #84  
What we do know for sure:
Kubota L4610
Hydrostat transmission
In a big hole
Engine ran fine
Tractor would sit and look at the hill and not do anything.
The problem was transmission related.

He apparently did NOT hit a pop off or relief. Do we know that? If he tested for that I don't remember.

_RaT_ said:
He apparently did NOT hit a pop off or relief. The only thing that was deduced was that the tractor was on a steep enough hill that the pickup tube pulled air (now that would be a very steep hill). The final conclusion was never 100% other then the tractor would not move but then, the engine would not load up either. Bad linkage as John Miller III sugests, maybe, we may never know. I know I have been in similar circumstances with my front end buried down hill to where it took all my bucket force and spinning tires to get me out. No popoff popping. Heres the thread for folks to browse.

http://www.tractorbynet.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20041&highlight=L4610
 
   / hydrostat vs gear hp loss #85  
JerryG said:
What we do know for sure:
Kubota L4610
Hydrostat transmission
In a big hole
Engine ran fine
Tractor would sit and look at the hill and not do anything.
The problem was transmission related.

He apparently did NOT hit a pop off or relief. Do we know that? If he tested for that I don't remember.


It was some time ago and as I recall, he said the odd thing was the engine did not load up as you would expect leading up to a relief situation and thus the many thoughts and opinions as to what could be the problem such as sucking air or as John Miller III said, a mechanical linkage issue. I could be wrong. As the owner of both a gear and hydrostatic drive, I say it was a mechanical problem not inherent to HST. I say this because neither my L48 or my current L3830 can produce the issue that the "Whats ailing my Bota" thread had nor have I seen a plethora of posts addressing the same thing. Its not from a lack of terrain out here to have such a test executed since the foothills where many of us TBN folks reside will produce similar scenarios on a daily basis. It may be hard to explain just how steep a hill I have put my Kubota on, but I would venture to say, 95% of the folks would simply not do it. I have had to use my loader with the tooth bar to help push myself out all the while my front wheel(s) and both rear wheels were spinning. I have on occasion had to have my wife help drag me out with the truck. That was also the case with my old NH 2120 too, a gear drive. This seems to contrast with the post that Soundguy made about gears drives on a normal functioning HST. Of course his experience with HST may well differ from mine as I am only familiar enough with Kubota's to comment. I must also offer that my experience with HST is only about 1100 hours to date and that with gears would be several thousand. RaT...
 
Last edited:
   / hydrostat vs gear hp loss #86  
While I agree that if it had been a gear tranny.. it may have chewed him up.. but.. I think he needs to sell that tractor and get one with a ROPS and SEATBELT.. reguardless of the tranny...

Soundguy

qstott said:
A friend of mine discoved what he now considers to be a very important advantage of hydro over gear. Last week he was clearing some land down near the river. He was using a Kuboto with a fel. I haven't had a chance to speak with him directly, and what I have heard has been heersay, and what was published in the local paper. It seems he managed to flip the tractor on its back and then rolled it on its side. He was trapped underneath the rear wheel. He said the tractor ran for a loooong time, it finally cut off when the oil flooded the engine. It smoked and snorted and just kept running for what seemed like an eternity. His arm and shoulder were pinned underneath the rear wheel. He was able to get his pocket knife and dig out enough space under his body to enable himself to scratch and claw with his finders to dig enough of a hole to make clearance to slid himself out from under the wheel. It took him almost four hours to get out from under the tractor. He then walked to a nearby house about a mile away. He was very lucky. His worst injury was a broken collar bone. He said that if he had been using a gear drive tractor, the wheel would have just chewed him up and spit him out. He was very grateful that since it was a hydro, the wheels stopped turing when he fell off. He learned several lessons that day, many of which he had forgotten in his 40+ years of driving tractors.
 
   / hydrostat vs gear hp loss #87  
The single largest "cause" of inefficiency would probably be a tractor that ISN'T compatable to an operators skills or abilities. If that operator prefers Hydro, than I'd venture a guess he's more efficient WITH hydro. In the hands of a qualified, experienced operator, a gear tractor may well be just as smooth, just as fast cycling as a hydro.

The somwhat difficult (on to IMPOSSIBLE) to measure difference in efficiency would be negated by operator skills in most cases IMHO.

It's all what you're used to and what you LIKE.

By the way, give me GEAR drive any day for what I do. I'm used to it, like it, and feel more comfortable with gear drive. That in no way says it's better or worse.
 
   / hydrostat vs gear hp loss #88  
SPYDERLK said:
This does not fit with my experience. Deducing from the ones I have driven

I believe it's written down in the operator's manuel..
 
Last edited:
   / hydrostat vs gear hp loss #89  
Soundguy said:
get one with a ROPS and SEATBELT.. Soundguy

Believe it was equiped with ROPS and belt but the operator acknowledged he was not wearing the belt as the story was told to me. Understand he plans to wear his belt from now on.

This was just a couple miles from where I live. My neighbor happened to be passing by the next day and saw an excavator carrying the wounded Kobota across the field in a sling to a waiting dealer's trailer.

Lucky man. There have been 4 tractor related accidents resulting in 2 deaths in about a 20 mile radius in the past week or so.
 
   / hydrostat vs gear hp loss #90  
dieselsmoke1 said:
Believe it was equiped with ROPS and belt but the operator acknowledged he was not wearing the belt as the story was told to me. Understand he plans to wear his belt from now on.

This was just a couple miles from where I live. My neighbor happened to be passing by the next day and saw an excavator carrying the wounded Kobota across the field in a sling to a waiting dealer's trailer.

Lucky man. There have been 4 tractor related accidents resulting in 2 deaths in about a 20 mile radius in the past week or so.

Must be an East coast thing, it just doesn't happen out here. :eek:
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2016 FORD F-150XL SINGLE CAB TRUCK (A51406)
2016 FORD F-150XL...
2019 CHEVY 5500 CAB CHASSIS (A50505)
2019 CHEVY 5500...
2018 INTERNATIONAL 4400 SBA 4X2 SERVICE TRUCK (A51406)
2018 INTERNATIONAL...
2007 Hyundai Santa Fe SUV (A49461)
2007 Hyundai Santa...
2021 McFarlane IC-5140 Vertical Tillage Tool (A50657)
2021 McFarlane...
2018 PETERBILT 579 SLEEPER (A51222)
2018 PETERBILT 579...
 
Top