</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Go read it again or have it read to you. )</font>
Are you trying to imply that Bob can't read it himself. Come on Cub Tech, maybe you weren't trying to be rude (as you said) but it sure comes across that way to me. Maybe I'm just reading it wrong (sorry if that's the case), but that's just how it looks to me.
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Buy a newer model if you want mow n reverse!)</font>
No, I'm not buying a new mower with some new "technology" that allows me to mow in reverse when I can just disable the switch on the one I currently own. If I somehow figure out a way to kill myself mowing in reverse, I promise my wife will not sue CC.
Give me a break, my Cub would drive me nuts if I couldn't back up without killing the PTO. I'd be resetting it about 50 times every time I cut the grass. No thanks!
Cub Tech, I do agree with you about the manufacturer not being responsible if the unit is altered. Yes, it is common sense. If I disable the switch, then somehow hurt myself or somebody else mowing in reverse, I'm not going to blame CC. It's my own fault. That's what's wrong with this country, everybody wants to blame somebody else for their mistakes.