Too bad ash is a bad firewood. Yeah, great for starting and can be burned almost green, but no btu. First load I bought was 95% ash. I won't be using him again.
Ash is one of the best "common" firewoods. I have never heard ANYONE say that it is bad firewood.
BTU's per cord, it is nearly the same as maple, red oak, white oak, and beech. And is better than cherry and elm and walnut. (assuming we are taking about white ash). Only the likes of hickory, locust, hedge, and ironwood are better. But they are much more difficult to split and not nearly as common.
Are you sure it was ash and not a poplar species? Sometimes the bark is hard to tell appart and if you got a load already split, it's not like you could see the leaves/buds.
Also, just so everyone knows, ALL wood has nearly the same BTU per pound. So the heavier the wood, the more BTU, the lighter, less BTU. The only reason I say nearly is because some woods naturally get to a lower moisture content than others. But if Moisture % is the same, BTU is the same by weight. If you were to buy firewood by weight only, It would not matter what the species is. All that would be needed is for it to be dry. One ton of dry poplar will produce the same BTU's as 1 ton of dry oak or hedge. It would just take up more room.
Just thought I would throw that out there. But the comment that ash is "bad firewood" is just not correct. It is a highly desired and excellent firewood. Sure it's not the "best", but it is still excellent.
Check this out if you get bored
Tree Species and Firewood BTU Ratings Chart for Heat Energy Content