CloverKnollFarms
Super Member
I have not nor never will get to that level of income.![]()
They doubled our pay my last few years at work... This farm kid was living a dream
I have not nor never will get to that level of income.![]()
The last time I was around that dream, I'd just opened the fuel door under a 727 wing, the fuel cap popped off, and jet fuel poured into my eyes. I wondered off holding my eyes reaching for help. No one could hear me screaming above the noise of the APU. When I finally got one eye open, I was 100' off the starboard wing, so I turned around and staggered back until I could find someone to take me to the hospital.They doubled our pay my last few years at work... This farm kid was living a dream
Sigh. The greater percentage thing is a red herring. Those same people get public funds that more than offset anything they would pay.An issue with sales tax is that low income earners have to spend a greater percentage of their income on necessities than high income earners. A flat tax with no min or max caps means everyone is in for the same percentage of their income. Sales tax, property tax, excise tax could all be eliminated if everyone paid the same percentage. Same thing with FICA cap. Remove it and social security would be funded.
This is the mantra of folks that don't want to pay the same percentage of taxes as poor people with no cap. It's been that way since I was a kid.Sigh. The greater percentage thing is a red herring. Those same people get public funds that more than offset anything they would pay.
...
Dont get me started on school taxes. I believe those with more kids should pay more than those with no kids. Ill never believe differently.This is the mantra of folks that don't want to pay the same percentage of taxes as poor people with no cap. It's been that way since I was a kid.
Similar to the argument about why should my tax dollars go toward public education when I don't have any children.
I hear you, even as one who has kids, but I don't have an easy solution. It's in the countries best interest to have an educated public. We can ignore if what we have is actually education. The cost of schooling has been mandated to be ridiculously high. IF those with kids that were actually going to school were the ones paying, most would not be able to afford to send them. In NYS, you'd be looking at over $20K/yr/child. That would quickly result in public schools collapsing inside of a year.Dont get me started on school taxes. I believe those with more kids should pay more than those with no kids. Ill never believe differently.
I believe people should know what it's going to cost to raise a bunch of kids well before they hop into the back seat of a car..... but that'll never happen.Dont get me started on school taxes. I believe those with more kids should pay more than those with no kids. Ill never believe differently.
I don't have any kids (that I know of), but I don't have a problem with paying my share of education costs. Every dollar of my share that I don't pay gets put onto someone else. Raising a child is expensive, why add to parents' burden more than you have to. The only thing that kind of frosts me is the attitude many school boards have is "you don't have any kids in school, your opinion on what we do doesnt' matter". Bull. Almost 70% of my property taxes go towards schools, yeah it DOES matter.Dont get me started on school taxes. I believe those with more kids should pay more than those with no kids. Ill never believe differently.
Sales taxes are the broadest, most fair option to replace other means of taxation. Easy to implement. Hard to avoid. Captures taxes from people who currently avoid any taxation...people who earn illegally, people who are resident aliens, visitors, etc. All of the negatives associated with sales taxes can easily be ameliorated by public policy that helps the truly poor.
Many years ago someone I knew was running for the local school board. We got to talking and I mentioned I really didn't have any dog in that fight, as our kids don't go to public schools. His reply?I don't have any kids (that I know of), but I don't have a problem with paying my share of education costs. Every dollar of my share that I don't pay gets put onto someone else. Raising a child is expensive, why add to parents' burden more than you have to. The only thing that kind of frosts me is the attitude many school boards have is "you don't have any kids in school, your opinion on what we do doesnt' matter". Bull. Almost 70% of my property taxes go towards schools, yeah it DOES matter.
.....
Some do think about consequences and might even be considered selfish when it comes to education tax dollars.I believe people should know what it's going to cost to raise a bunch of kids well before they hop into the back seat of a car..... but that'll never happen.
I'd also rather have educated kids with a chance for success than angry, uneducated, hungry kids running around turning into angry, uneducated, hungry adults.
One thing that seems to get lost often in these types of conversations is the kids didn't ask to be put in those situations. We, as a society, shouldn't punish them for the mistakes/poor choices of their parents.
No one in Indiana pays sales tax on food, rich or poor.But many low income pay little to no taxes in general…
A higher sales tax with no tax on food would cover that essential.
There are so many tax proposals floating around it’s scary.
One is a tax on every package delivered as delivered often means money leaving the community.
Another is the junk food tax and another a fee for using public on street parking by making it permit only.
I would have used it back then to buy some tractors etc. A newer 4020 with a loader and a 4430 cab, HVAC, a 336 baler, 1479 self propelled, just to start with. They would have kept their value, too.Except that my tax bracket has been jumped TWICE and is way over what I was making in my good engineering job. So there's been no 'savings' for me at all.
I don't. Why? Any time you add exceptions in taxation, you get cheating and manipulation. No tax on food sounds great. Who decides what is food? Is a coke food? How about candy? Why should taxpayers subsidize foods that aren't nutritious? What about 'luxury' foods like caviar? Vegans might want to say meat should be taxed. Certain religious types might think only pork should be taxed. Maybe we only tax imported foods....needless complexity.idaho has sales tax on food, which i think is way wrong
Hay if you eliminate chocolate from my diet….. that would eliminate half my food…… just sayingI don't. Why? Any time you add exceptions in taxation, you get cheating and manipulation. No tax on food sounds great. Who decides what is food? Is a coke food? How about candy? Why should taxpayers subsidize foods that aren't nutritious? What about 'luxury' foods like caviar? Vegans might want to say meat should be taxed. Certain religious types might think only pork should be taxed. Maybe we only tax imported foods....needless complexity.
The solution to low income people paying sales taxes is making staples available at social services. Food and clothing. Just the basics.
You can still eat it, you just have to pay tax on it like everyone else.Hay if you eliminate chocolate from my diet….. that would eliminate half my food…… just saying