Mybe this is just me, but I have read in countless places how the racking of a pump shotgun is enough to scare off most intruders. First....I would like to know where the evidence is for that. I truly suspect it is purely anecdotal. Any perp/intruder high on drugs, particularly stimulants, isn't likely to give a rodent's south end about a metallic click-click. Second....if I have to grab my shotgun at night, I am already in condition red, code 5, whatever you want to call it....I am at the extreme level of my defensive posture, and that shotgun is pumped the instant it gets in my hands. Besides the other things we have, we do have a Mossberg Persuader...I keep it with the chamber empty, magazine fully loaded, trigger pulled...so it is ready to be cocked without finding the slide release. Third....one of the very last things I want to do is help a perp/intruder indentify my location by making a distinctive noise. I keep a cell phone turned on at night with the all the noise-making stuff off....keypad beeps, etc. Who wants to dial 911 with a phone screaming "Hey! I'm right here."? I've even thought about setting it so all the lights stay off and just trying to dial by touch....but haven't done that....yet.
My wife has a 2" Taurus 85 because it gets carried. In the house the revolvers kept loaded are 4", all with 38 Special. Interesting site below re: penetration of various rounds.
Box o' Truth
Somewhere I had (switched PCs last week :>( a bookmark on a chart of documented shootings over a period, and the % of stops with given calibers. I will look for it....it was revelationary for me, as it was the second compilation I've seen that debunks the 40 S&W, which I have as a primary pistol caliber. The 9mm fared better, and as well as the 38 Special as I recall. Of the calibers with a reasonable number of incidents, the 357 was the clear winner, and the numbers on 22, 25, and 32 were just plain scary they were so low. I recall 45 being second, but more behind 357 than I would have guessed.
I've owned dozens of revolvers in my life (actually scores, but not hundreds). Older Smiths are masterpieces. Many older Colts are pretty nice too. I've never seen a Ruger that wasn't rock solid in terms of reliability and durability. I've had perhaps 10-12 Taurus firearms, all satisfactory to very good. I know of one fellow 15 years ago or so with a very old (maybe bought in the 70s or whenever Taurus first hit the US market) chrome plated Taurus 32 or 38 that had firing pin problems. Two friends of mine own what has become one of the largest volume gun stores in SW Ohio over the past decade. They see what comes back. I don't think a person will do any better buying a new Smith than a new Ruger or Taurus revolver. If you're going to shoot a high volume of rounds, buy Ruger. If you want junk, look for the first generation of Smith pistols with the decocker.
For all using rifle calibers as a primary home defense.....have you considered your neighbor 1/4 mile away? Even a factory 357 magnum is going through several walls.
LINK