Grapple mfg. website???

[FarmerEddy]

G'day all,

I was browsing the forums yesterday & came across a link to a web-site for an attachment mfg. that caught my eye.

Apparently, before I remembered to bookmark the page, or follow the forum thread......something else shiny caught my eye.

I've now spent 2-3 hours digging for it & thought I'd just give in & ask for an assist.

My memory of the website/mfg was that the name was very odd, with i believe SQ at the beginning.
The site itself was very bold, yellow on black.
they seemed to specialize in grapple/bucket type attachements.

This has rapidly become a weekend "moby dick".:confused2:
Wife keeps walking by asking "are you STILLLLLL looking for that "thing"??"

Any ideas????

Thanks in advance,

Eddy

 

[Glen Watkins]

I wonder if it was the one that was on a Cub Cadet? Was it galvanized?

Dragon Products

http://www.tractorbynet.com/forums/attachments/196965-got-new-grapple-today-my.html

 

[FarmerEddy]

Not it, but thanks for trying.

 

[RogerMc]

How about this one.

ANBO Manufacturing, Makers of agricultural and construction attachments for all types of loaders, backhoes and tractors

Roger

 

[FarmerEddy]

Closer, but still not quite. Thanks Again

 

[Grandad4]

This probably isn't what you were looking for, but it's worth a look. The had a display at a farm expo here recently and it looked pretty interesting.

Home | Precision Manufacturing

 

[FarmerEddy]

You were right.......it wasn't the one I was looking for......but.....
Keep 'em coming

I've yet to meet a tractor attachement I didn't want to see

 

[jake98]

Here's one:
rootgrapple.com

 

[dstig1]

These guys?
Skid Steer Attachments : Bobcat Brush Cutter : Tractor Attachments : Snowblower Attachment : Quick Attach Attachments, Inc.

 

[gengine]

I just happened to be looking at grapple attachments the other day too, and your post made me think about Hay Farm Equipment | Skidsteer Attachments | Hay Spear Attachments They have all sorts of attachments. What kind of attachment were you looking for? That might give us a better idea...