wawajake
Veteran Member
I could not help but notice that even in the USA the Engine sizing quoted in maketing is using the metric sizing instead of the cubic inch sizing many of us older folks remember fondly.
Think back to those tried and true engine sizes that as soon as you heard the cubic inch size you knew the history of the motor.
The Ford 302, OR the GM 350 , 327, 307, or the Dodge 318 or 360 .
What I do find interesting is the the metric system of sizing engine is less accurate than the tried and true cubic inches, eg the 307 or 305 using metric difference would be lost in the decimals.
Anyway , what other engines bring back fond memories ! Mine was the 350 4 barrel I had in my 1979 Chev Fleetside. With a four speed manual transmission on the floor (Bull low was rarely used except for boat launch ramps)
Think back to those tried and true engine sizes that as soon as you heard the cubic inch size you knew the history of the motor.
The Ford 302, OR the GM 350 , 327, 307, or the Dodge 318 or 360 .
What I do find interesting is the the metric system of sizing engine is less accurate than the tried and true cubic inches, eg the 307 or 305 using metric difference would be lost in the decimals.
Anyway , what other engines bring back fond memories ! Mine was the 350 4 barrel I had in my 1979 Chev Fleetside. With a four speed manual transmission on the floor (Bull low was rarely used except for boat launch ramps)