Ford Rant

   / Ford Rant #41  
i prefer manual shifters and locking hubs too. my '95 toyota 4x4 truck had this. my '04 Z71 has the push button and while it has never given me any trouble, im still not a huge fan of it.
 
   / Ford Rant
  • Thread Starter
#42  
RayH said:
Let me guess, your old Jeep had Quadratrac right?

No. Full manual transfer case. Straight back to 4wd, back, over and up for 4 low.
 
   / Ford Rant
  • Thread Starter
#43  
RoyJackson said:
I don't see what you mean by "ill will" being genetrated by the automotive companies in the 70's and 80's. They built some nice, if not memorable cars then...well, look at the early 70's Mustangs and Chevelles, both collector's cars now. But Ford, GM and Chrysler provided decent transportation.

Geez Roy, did you read anything I said about my '76 Cherokee? How would that experience not generate ill will? Same with my Dad's Fury III and Ford Ranch Wagon. Pure, unadulterated rolling junk. I'm not saying there were no good cars from the '70s, but there sure were a lot of bad ones.

That is what the Japs took advantage of. Remember laughing at those first tiny little Hondas and Chevy Luv pickups? I do.

Edit: And for what it's worth, at the time I thought my Cherokee (faults and all) was really cool. Four wheel drive trucks were much less common in those days. I was 19 or 20. It was roomy. And truth be told, I still think it was and is a great looking vehicle.
 
   / Ford Rant #44  
George,

Per your idea about something on the button. How about a thumb tack?

:)

Chuck
 
   / Ford Rant #46  
N80 said:
Geez Roy, did you read anything I said about my '76 Cherokee? How would that experience not generate ill will? Same with my Dad's Fury III and Ford Ranch Wagon. Pure, unadulterated rolling junk. I'm not saying there were no good cars from the '70s, but there sure were a lot of bad ones.

Yep, I read it all. One person's opinion of a vehicle that was actually pretty popular. One person's opinion does not make a vehicle or design "bad".

To be fair, the early Cherokees did have teething problems in the first years of production. Since Jeep bought a lot of the components used from other manufacturers (the levers on the steering columm where identical to my Chevy S-10's), I'd guess they had integration problems. I know my mother's Cherokee (a 79, I think) was a nice reliable vehicle, although I personnally never cared much for Cherokees...too narrow and a bit tippy. But that design (of the Cherokee) has been around for a lot of years now with millions of satisfied customers.

The only real dog from the 70's (that I recall) was when GM tried to make a diesel out of the 350 gas engine. That cost savings concept cost GM a lot of money. Once they put a real diesel (6.2 liter) out, the reliability problems went away (although I thought the engine was underpowered and not a good fit for an automatic transmission).

N80, all I'm saying is your complaints about a given vehicle doesn't make the vehicle design junk or have created widespread ill will among the customer base. You're basing your critique upon 30 year old memories.

Anyway, this rant has gone on long enough...for me, anyway.
 
   / Ford Rant #47  
Gotta disagree about the only dog being the attempt to make the 350 a diesel. There was the not-very-durable aluminum block Vega, the Monza that required raising the engine off it's mounts to change spark plugs, the prone-to-engine-fires Fiero (ok, this was early 80s)....and those are just the ones I personally know of from GM.

Chrysler had the K-cars, with K standing for kra--y, Ford the exploding Pinto, and who can forget AMC's aptly named Gremlin.
 
   / Ford Rant #48  
A '79 Cherokee would be an SJ - a "full size jeep" like the wagoneer. Nice design, but terrible execution. In its favor, everything is nicely tucked up underneath compared to pickup based SUVs (the Jeep pickup was based on the SUV, not the otherway around).

The XJ Cherokee was first sold in '84. Completely different animal, and much better built and more reliable (with the exception of the ones with the 2.8 V6 from GM).
 
   / Ford Rant
  • Thread Starter
#49  
RoyJackson said:
Yep, I read it all. One person's opinion of a vehicle that was actually pretty popular. One person's opinion does not make a vehicle or design "bad".

Roy, it really boils down to this: The truck was a dog. I had friends that had them, they were dogs. It did have redeeming qualities, but it was still poorly made and the quality of virtually all AMC vehicles was legendary....in a bad way. But Roy, I said that the American automakers generated a lot of ill will. That's pretty much a point of historical reference. My one opinion and yours has little bearing on that. The quality of American vehicles, particularly AMC and Dodge/Chrysler was at an all time nadir and did not improve until driven to do so by the imports. You can lapse nostalgic all you wish, but it won't change this fact.

To be fair, the early Cherokees did have teething problems in the first years of production.

Roy, the Cherokee had its teething problems in the late sixties and early 70's. By 76 this vehicle had been around plenty long enough to get past 'teething' problems. Now it sounds like you are just making excuses. And I'm not real sure why. We bought ours on the recommendation of a close friend who had a 72 that was a pretty good truck. His next one was a dog. His full sized Jeep pick-up was a dog. His next vehicle was an import. My best friend in med school had 2 Wagoneers. We spent our weekends working on them....constantly.

I personnally never cared much for Cherokees...too narrow and a bit tippy. But that design (of the Cherokee) has been around for a lot of years now with millions of satisfied customers.

With all due respect Roy, I'm starting to think you don't know what you are talking about. The Cherokee was a huge, very wide, low and very stable 4x4. You are clearly thinking about the later models, the small ones. I don't know anything about them but I've specified continuously that I'm talking about the 1970's. AMC. No little Cherokees in the 1970's. That started maybe about 82 or 83.

The only real dog from the 70's (that I recall) was when GM tried to make a diesel out of the 350 gas engine.

OMG. You have got to be kidding. You can only think of ONE dog from the 70's?!?! Roy, the 70's is the decade of the American junk car. As other have mentioned, anyone can rattle off a long list of not just bad but laughably bad cars from the 70's and early 80's. It's comedian material man. Where have you been?

N80, all I'm saying is your complaints about a given vehicle doesn't make the vehicle design junk or have created widespread ill will among the customer base. You're basing your critique upon 30 year old memories.

Hmmm. So my 30 year old memories are the source of the shame of the American automakers in the 70's. I'm pretty sure, at this point, that my 30 year old memories might be based in a little more reality than yours.

But relax Roy. I never even brought up any of this stuff. I simply said my otherwise good Ford truck had one element of undeniably bad ergonomic implementation. You'd have thought, from responses like yours, that I'd baked the flag in an apple pie and hit my mom in the face with it at a baseball game.
 
   / Ford Rant #50  
Like I wrote, N80...I've "spoke" my piece...think what you want to. This thread's going in circles now.
 
Last edited:
   / Ford Rant #51  
I have purchased only 1 new car in my life (Just turned 53 today). A 1985 Ford Escort. The thing lasted 2 years before the engine blew up. Ford told me that it was my problem with 38K miles on it. Never purchased another car from them to this day. I have only Hondas/Toyotas since. I am on my 6th Honda and 5th Toyota. If I don't get 200K+ miles on them I would be very disappointed and I have not been disappointed yet.

So how much did Ford really loose by the ill will generated by that 1 transaction because of the lack of quality?

Oh, I do have a 1981 Ford Bronco sitting up on blocks that I use to spilt wood (unicorn splitter in place of the tire). Got it for free.

Pet Peeve:

The stupid high beam indicator in the 1981-85 Bronco was too bright and could not be turned down using the dashboard light dimmer!!!
 
   / Ford Rant
  • Thread Starter
#52  
RoyJackson said:
Like I wrote, N80...I've "spoke" my piece...think what you want to. This thread's going in circles now.

Well gosh Roy. You kinda jumped on me with both feet on this one from the very beginning. Big fonts and preachy attitude and all. Suggesting outright that I didn't know my vehicle. Then you continue to argue with anything I say and claim you're reading my posts. And yet, you're aruging with me about the wrong vehicle.

And then when I call you on it you want to get all dismissive like somebody's picking on you. You know, if you're going to dish it out....continuously, it really aint fair to complain about things going in circles when someone responds to you....continuosly. Big fonts don't make you right they just make you loud.
 
   / Ford Rant
  • Thread Starter
#53  
RockyMnt1 said:
I have purchased only 1 new car in my life (Just turned 53 today). A 1985 Ford Escort. The thing lasted 2 years before the engine blew up. Ford told me that it was my problem with 38K miles on it. Never purchased another car from them to this day.

I'm generally that way too. My current Nissan is a good car/suv but it isn't stellar, like my previous ones. So I'll probably look elsewhere.

The funny thing about this whole thread is that this little flaw in my F-150 isn't enough for me to ditch the truck and I still my buy another when the time comes.

That's what's so ironic here. I pointed out a flaw. That's all. I think some people read a lot more into it than I intended.
 
   / Ford Rant #54  
N80 said:
Well gosh Roy. You kinda jumped on me with both feet on this one from the very beginning. Big fonts and preachy attitude and all. Suggesting outright that I didn't know my vehicle. Then you continue to argue with anything I say and claim you're reading my posts. And yet, you're aruging with me about the wrong vehicle.

And then when I call you on it you want to get all dismissive like somebody's picking on you. You know, if you're going to dish it out....continuously, it really aint fair to complain about things going in circles when someone responds to you....continuosly. Big fonts don't make you right they just make you loud.

Sorry, lad...not going to rise to this...
 
   / Ford Rant #55  
With all the talk of the 1970's problems, I'm surprised no one mentioned the Ford rust problem(maybe just a salt belt problem?). Within a couple of years after purchase some people had rust forming on the hood, roof and all kinds of strange places, not to mention the undercarriage. At that time it appeared it was going to cost Ford market share, forever. They turned it around and within a few years of strong marketing, and fewer bean cans for metal:rolleyes: , showed few ill effects. This was not a Ford only problem.....Challengers and Cuda's couldn't keep fenders or trunks on them, among other vehicles, but Ford was the one I remember getting sued successfully.
 
   / Ford Rant
  • Thread Starter
#56  
RoyJackson said:
Sorry, lad...not going to rise to this...

Roy, how many times are you going to post that you're not going to post?:rolleyes:

You know, I'm sorry to be so relentless but you started this. Your posts are frequently rude, curt and quarrelsome. You have a lot of posts and I guess you've been around here a while and so I suppose you can bully some people. Not me. If you aren't going to "rise" to it, then don't. Posturing as if you're above it is an irony that won't be lost on anyone here.
 
   / Ford Rant #57  
With all the talk of the 1970's problems, I'm surprised no one mentioned the Ford rust problem(maybe just a salt belt problem?).
I seem to remember that the peeling paint problem was GM. And silver/gray was the worst. I had a 77 silver Vega (I know) that the paint starting peeling after 1 yr and the engine starting fouling the #1 plug at approx 38K. The dealer to his credit touched up the paint but it barely lasted two yrs, just enough to get out of warranty and the engine was out of warranty. I put one of those extend a plug adapters on #1 and it ran pretty good but it still used about a qrt every 500 miles.
I then married a gal w/a 76 Vette, Chevette that is. I won't even get into the weekends I spent wrenching that little imported Chevy. Oh and it's paint peeled too.

My 1st car was a 65 Corvair (I know part deaux :D) but it was one of the most fun cars I ever owned. As long as I kept an eye on the oil level it ran real good but guess what, yep, the paint peeled too.

After 3 GM cars I got to thinking that I was jinxed and then I bought a Ford product. A 67 Mercury Cyclone GT. The fastest car I ever owned btw. GT 390, 415hp and I put well over 100k hard miles on it before I wrecked it. Had very few problems with it. Still miss that car. Oh and the paint never peeled :D

The funny thing about this whole thread is that this little flaw in my F-150
I don't know that I'd call it a flaw, but then again I guess I would if'n I had hit it twice :D :D
 

Attachments

  • F150 004 small.jpg
    F150 004 small.jpg
    66.9 KB · Views: 120
   / Ford Rant #58  
N80 said:
Roy, how many times are you going to post that you're not going to post?:rolleyes:

You know, I'm sorry to be so relentless but you started this. Your posts are frequently rude, curt and quarrelsome. You have a lot of posts and I guess you've been around here a while and so I suppose you can bully some people. Not me. If you aren't going to "rise" to it, then don't. Posturing as if you're above it is an irony that won't be lost on anyone here.


Don't worry about it, bro...it's just a forum and I don't take it seriously
 
   / Ford Rant
  • Thread Starter
#59  
Volfandt, mine is black too. Wanted a red one (kid at heart) but they didn't have one and I needed it right away. When it is clean (rare) the black looks real sharp.

I'm due for new tires so soon I'm planning on new, and bigger tires, an MT of some sort. I'm not going to add a lift kit but may turn the torsion bars down a tad to give the front a little more height. Will have to mod the plastic fender trim a bit for tire clearance. I'm planning on adding Bilstein shocks and getting rid of the running boards (I don't think they help much and don't like the look). I'll probably keep the original rims, they look okay but I'm a sucker for the classic Outlaw II wheels by American Racing. I don't know if it has a steering stabilizer, if not, I'll add one.

I see no need to mess with the engine. A lot of people have dual exhaust added, but I don't like the noise and performance is fine. I'm not sure those air filter kits help anything. I don't know anything about the computer chips. The only reason I'd mess with the engine is if I could getter better mileage because it really sucks, 14mpg, tops.:eek: (I'm open to ideas.)

It already has the towing package.

A winch would be nice, but probably not in any budget of mine. (OT rant, if my wife and daughter weren't into horses it would be a whole different story, ugh.)

No plans for interior. Smells like a dirty Labrador anyway. Radio is fine.
 
   / Ford Rant #60  
Quote: I seem to remember that the peeling paint problem was GM.

You are right GM couldn't keep paint, grey/silver especially, on their vehicles. The Ford thing was inferior metal that rusted from the inside out , if I remember right. It was 30+ years ago:). I can still remember seeing the early seventies full size Fords with rust spots in the middle of the roof/hood 10" in diameter:eek: Here is a link to some of the secret warranties that most of the manufactures had http://http://www.autosafety.org/article.php?did=721. This is also good reading for anyone thinking that there is a secret warranty on their vehicle. I still think that Ford had a later 70's problem with rust. I think the term "using progressively inferior metals":confused: was used at that time, but as I said it was 30 years ago, and my memory isn't as good as it used to be. Not to seem like I am beating on Fords, I have a 2002 GMC that I bought new and could write pages on it's problems.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2021 CATERPILLAR D3 LGP CRAWLER DOZER (A60429)
2021 CATERPILLAR...
2012 MACK Tender Truck w/ADAMS Rear Discharge Bed Auger (A56438)
2012 MACK Tender...
CAT 289D3 (A58214)
CAT 289D3 (A58214)
2013 Nissan Rouge SUV (A59231)
2013 Nissan Rouge...
2018 ROSCO LEEBOY CHALLENGER 7 SWEEPER (A60429)
2018 ROSCO LEEBOY...
KOMATSU PC490LC-10 EXCAVATOR (A60429)
KOMATSU PC490LC-10...
 
Top