/pine
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2009
- Messages
- 12,450
First of all it's impossible to prove "it's" right or wrong...and the shenanigans they have pulled with the data only weaken the popular position...So that is what you are hoping for? GW science being wrong?
"Science" is constantly changing their positions and and almost always with a dichotomy of opinions...
O/T from the topic but not "science"...Take North American archaeology...Until recently it was and still is by many (stubborn scientists) believed that the Clovis tribes were the first to inhabit what is now America...recent finds in the FL panhandle are carbon dating much earlier and are not of the Clovis type...i.e.,...THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING...!
IMO the taxpayer monies that have already been wasted on failed green energy taxpayer money pits could/should have been used to fund innovative research on known alternatives that actually work efficiently...and protecting infrastructures that are susceptible natural and unnatural disasters...
And BTW...there would not be near so many that have doubts (both in and out of the field) if all their predictions have/had not come back to take bites out of their theory...