</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Ah, the old rooster -- no rooster debate! )</font>
We were very impressed with the Rhode Island Red roosters we had. They were very protective of the hens. One even took on a greyhound as it attacked the flock...and the dog was cut up pretty badly before my dogs even joined the fray! That rooster saw the dog coming and actually put himself between the attacker and the flock! Gotta admire bravery like that. We eventually lost that bird when he attempted to save the hens from a fox. /forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif
But generally we've found that roosters are more trouble than they're worth. They eat a LOT, brutalize the hens (barnyard *** is not the kinder, gentler variety), and make a LOT of noise.
Are the hens happier with roosters around? They don't seem to notice their absense, IMO. Do the eggs taste better? Maybe, but my taste buds can't tell the difference. Do they have more to eat without the males around? Absolutely!
But we miss the colorful character (and plumage) of the roosters. Our solution was to get a pair of banty roosters. They don't eat much, are too small to brutalize the hens, are just as pretty as their full-sized versions, are not as loud, and the hens seem pretty happy with them. Guess it's true that size doesn't matter! /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif
Pete