</font><font color="blue" class="small">( Urea is 47% nitrogen but too much nitrogen in a garden is not necessarily a good thing either. You might burn your plants or put them in a growing frenzy but stunt their ability as far as producing any vegetables.
Why not compost your chips separately in piles and once they have broken down add the compost to your garden. I make inexpensive composters out of discarded pallets by tying them together with short pieces of romex wire. )</font>
I thought about compost piles. Very logical and really the best choice. The biggest problem with compost piles is their appearance. Piles can be "seen", which causes the city officials to become "concerned". Trying to educate these "experts" on the value of composting is tough, if not impossible. These city officials become concerned when they see "piles". They start using words like solid waste, hazardous waste. Ignorance causes them to send nasty letters, making demands to clean up or suffer fines. This is all insane and irrational, but such is the situation in a community like mine where unsophisticated city officials make the rules and enforce the rules as they see fit. Arguing with these folks just gets you noticed even more, with more letters and fines.
So, composting is the best way, you and I both know that to be true. Some of the city officials simply don't get it and don't want to get it.
Now, if I till the chips into the soil, add urea and let is composts (rot) sight unseen (AKA no compost piles) the City Fathers pass by and smile. See no evil (compost piles) speak no evil (no fines, no letters).
I have been composting for 35 years. I simply don't have the time or energy to drag ignorant fools who run the local government into understanding. So I chose option #2, till chips and urea into the ground, let it rot and till more in more chips. The ground gradually gets higher, but imperceptibly so, so the changes being gradual, never noticed and generate no "concern" from the public officials paid to protect us from ourselves.
Bob