Yes, she has proof of insurance and I now have in my possession all kinds of documents from the insurance company stating that her first payment was received, that coverage started on Oct 6th, etc. And the letter dated Oct 27th which says due to the bank "not honoring" her payment the insurance is rescinded effected Oct 6th. She received this in the mail 11/2, the Monday after the accident.
Point is, the insurance company acknowledged receipt of payment and she had no reason to believe there was a problem in the interim, otherwise she would have corrected the problem with the routing number.
I cannot imagine that the software the ins co uses does not immediately know the routing number for a given bank is incorrect as soon as they enter it. Even a cheap program like Quicken knows immediately if the routing number you give it for a bank is wrong, as they have a database with all the correct routing numbers in it. And its JP Morgan Chase, the biggest bank there is, so its on everyone's list.
Somebody sat on it for 3 weeks, and this was probably intentional so that they would never have to pay a claim during that 3 week period.
Point is, the insurance company acknowledged receipt of payment and she had no reason to believe there was a problem in the interim, otherwise she would have corrected the problem with the routing number.
I cannot imagine that the software the ins co uses does not immediately know the routing number for a given bank is incorrect as soon as they enter it. Even a cheap program like Quicken knows immediately if the routing number you give it for a bank is wrong, as they have a database with all the correct routing numbers in it. And its JP Morgan Chase, the biggest bank there is, so its on everyone's list.
Somebody sat on it for 3 weeks, and this was probably intentional so that they would never have to pay a claim during that 3 week period.