My issue with this, If you turn off the "deep think" which shows it's reasoning, and just look at the answer, it puts out a pretty good sounding answer, but its wrong. When you read it's thought part, in this specific case, it's making a general assumption that, being an industrial city. it likely had a foundry, that it likely supplied materials to CSA, and was likely a target of destruction in the 1864 Battle of Palatka.
But its "answer" is Yep, destroyed in 1864 and never restarted.
I continued questions about this specific Battle, which apparently was more of a raid. It atleast got the CS leader right, Captain JJ Dickinson, which is accurate, i read a local book about him, and his campaign.
But, then, I started a brand new query, and asked about the specific march 1864 raid, and what was damaged; and once again, it guessed likely dock yards, lumber mills, and cotton facilities, as well as rail facilities. BUT, no mention of a foundry.
It's like it's taking very very surface level, "more likely than not" guesses, and stating them as facts.
It's guessing what where likely industries and likely military and economic targets, and then it is assuming they were targeted.