Robert_in_NY
Super Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2001
- Messages
- 8,588
- Location
- Silver Creek, NY
- Tractor
- Case-IH Farmall 45A, Kubota M8540 Narrow, New Holland TN 65, Bobcat 331, Ford 1920, 1952 John Deere M, Allis Chalmers B, Bombardier Traxter XT, Massey Harris 81RC and a John Deere 3300 combine, Cub Cadet GT1554
This post is to continue the discussion from the Farmtrac thread as we went on a tangent there. To anyone who doesn't know about what was said there Agco is going to drop the Agco brand and use the Agco name as its parts business.
Bill, I understand the history of Agco and I still feel they have dropped the ball on marketing here in the US. It was around 5 years ago if I remember correctly that they dropped Allis from Agco-Allis which upset a lot of the Allis faithful. Now they are dropping the Agco line all together. Why wait 5 years? Now you have another "brand" that is obsolete and depending on what happens with the current Agco dealers these owners are going to be playing the farmtrac game where they have to go to other dealers like Challanger or Massey Ferguson and play "which tractor is the same" unless Agco has a database that shows every Agco product and parts list so any of the Agco brands can order them.
I know Agco bought Valtra because they wanted Sisu and Valtra was a growing brand here in North America. Since Agco aquired them you don't hear about Valtra anymore. But you see Agco put the Sisu diesel in a lot of their products so I wonder how long they will keep Valtra.
I actually like Agco as a whole but some of their decisions seem short sighted. If you buy a company for one aspect why run the rest of the company into the ground only to let it go away. If they wanted Sisu, buy Valtra, take Sisu and sell off the Tractor line. If Massey Ferguson was going to be their major brand worldwide why go to the trouble of dropping the Allis name only to drop the Agco brand 5 years or so later? You have all these marketing dollars basically wasted on a brand that is going to be eliminated. Why wouldn't they have just dropped the entire Agco-Allis brand and invest all their money from marketing and brand engineering on Massey Ferguson? These are the types of moves that Agco has made over and over that makes the public scratch their head and it doesn't help Agco's image in the tractor community that wants brand security now more then ever.
Farmwithjunk said:AGCO didn't own the Massey Ferguson name until far after they owned Allis Chalmers/Oliver/White/ect. AGCO bought the MF name more than 15 years after they bought White and AC. Once they got the Massey name, they've been gradually heading towards putting that name on most all of their AG line-up. AGCO would have never got their chance to buy MF had it not been for Conrad Black and his corporate raiding of MF. They were a solid company with fantastic sales numbers in the world market.
AGCO has a licensing agreement with Caterpillar regarding the Challenger line-up. Massey Ferguson owned Perkins diesel. When AGCO bought Massey FErguson, they got Perkins along with the deal. Caterpillar wanted Perkins. At owns Perkins now, and as a result of that deal, AGCO builds the Challenger tractor line which CAT dealers sell. Obviously we have a case where some of you aren't familiar with AGCO and are making comments based on what you DON'T know about them. They went after these "names" in order to get the name recognition and the dealer networks. By the time AGCO bought the names of Oliver/Cockshutt/White and Allis Chalmers, those brands wree so far behind the market, their products were no longer the "big name" they once were. Gleaner, which was owned by Allis Chalmers was the reason why AGCO went after AC. White had a line of air planters that was the envy of the industry at the time. AGCO went after White for them. As those products became obsolete, so did the names of Allis Chalmers and White. Beyond that, Massey Ferguson outsold White AND allis Chalmers in the worldwide tractor business by a huge margin. They're STILL one of the biggest sellers worldwide. MF combines have always been big sellers. AGCO's products are huge sellers overseas. In this day and age, the US market isn't the only focus of major AG manufacturing. In the last few years, AGCO, with the Massey FErguson name front and center, are making inroads to regain a stronger share of the US market. Their ties to Caterpillar won't hurt that one bit.
Bill, I understand the history of Agco and I still feel they have dropped the ball on marketing here in the US. It was around 5 years ago if I remember correctly that they dropped Allis from Agco-Allis which upset a lot of the Allis faithful. Now they are dropping the Agco line all together. Why wait 5 years? Now you have another "brand" that is obsolete and depending on what happens with the current Agco dealers these owners are going to be playing the farmtrac game where they have to go to other dealers like Challanger or Massey Ferguson and play "which tractor is the same" unless Agco has a database that shows every Agco product and parts list so any of the Agco brands can order them.
I know Agco bought Valtra because they wanted Sisu and Valtra was a growing brand here in North America. Since Agco aquired them you don't hear about Valtra anymore. But you see Agco put the Sisu diesel in a lot of their products so I wonder how long they will keep Valtra.
I actually like Agco as a whole but some of their decisions seem short sighted. If you buy a company for one aspect why run the rest of the company into the ground only to let it go away. If they wanted Sisu, buy Valtra, take Sisu and sell off the Tractor line. If Massey Ferguson was going to be their major brand worldwide why go to the trouble of dropping the Allis name only to drop the Agco brand 5 years or so later? You have all these marketing dollars basically wasted on a brand that is going to be eliminated. Why wouldn't they have just dropped the entire Agco-Allis brand and invest all their money from marketing and brand engineering on Massey Ferguson? These are the types of moves that Agco has made over and over that makes the public scratch their head and it doesn't help Agco's image in the tractor community that wants brand security now more then ever.