jinman
Rest in Peace
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2001
- Messages
- 20,387
- Location
- Texas - Wise County - Sunset
- Tractor
- NHTC45D, NH LB75B, Ford Jubilee
Gary - Sorry I didn't see your RE before. Thanks for the welcome. I am new to this board, but a long time tractor owner and the proud owner of a new TC45D with 16LA FEL. I'm one of those guys who would rather read tech manuals than spy novels (reality is sometimes stranger than fiction). The manual I was referring to was my new 16LA FEL User's Manual. I plan to buy service manuals also.
About your loader - Yesterday I "popped" an 8" dia. blackjack oak with my loader bucket after undercutting the roots. I've added the cutter blade to my loader and it has really increased the functionality. Last week I took out three willows which were multi-trunk of 6" or more. My bucket and hydraulics performed flawlessly. Although I lifted the rear tires slightly a couple of times (R4s-empty, +6' industrial box blade) I don't think I changed the bucket geometry .001". This is one solid setup.
Of course, this tractor is not a dozer. It takes patience, a well thought-out approach, and a continual awareness of safety. Also, with all the rain we have had recently in N. TX, I'd be remiss not to mention the aid of mother nature in my exploits. If the ground was dry and hard, I'd find something else to do with my blue./w3tcompact/icons/cool.gif
On the subject of loader strength - I have a Ford 4000 ('64) with a loader so heavy that I cannot back up on level ground if the loader is 1/3 full of gravel (with rear wheel weights, water filled, + 6' box). It's not FWD, but I cannot imagine where the engineering brains were when this tractor was designed. I only keep it around because I can stick the huge bucket in the air and launch myself into the brush without worries of damage, scrapes, or scratches (except to myself). I suspect the 16LA loader bucket strength issue was an engineering tradeoff with the light-duty buckets being for folks who want to clean out stalls and the heavy duty buckets for folks like us who occasionally need to clear brush or pop a tree. I agree with you that 30 lb difference in weight doesn't engender a lot of faith in the "HD" label.
JimI
About your loader - Yesterday I "popped" an 8" dia. blackjack oak with my loader bucket after undercutting the roots. I've added the cutter blade to my loader and it has really increased the functionality. Last week I took out three willows which were multi-trunk of 6" or more. My bucket and hydraulics performed flawlessly. Although I lifted the rear tires slightly a couple of times (R4s-empty, +6' industrial box blade) I don't think I changed the bucket geometry .001". This is one solid setup.
Of course, this tractor is not a dozer. It takes patience, a well thought-out approach, and a continual awareness of safety. Also, with all the rain we have had recently in N. TX, I'd be remiss not to mention the aid of mother nature in my exploits. If the ground was dry and hard, I'd find something else to do with my blue./w3tcompact/icons/cool.gif
On the subject of loader strength - I have a Ford 4000 ('64) with a loader so heavy that I cannot back up on level ground if the loader is 1/3 full of gravel (with rear wheel weights, water filled, + 6' box). It's not FWD, but I cannot imagine where the engineering brains were when this tractor was designed. I only keep it around because I can stick the huge bucket in the air and launch myself into the brush without worries of damage, scrapes, or scratches (except to myself). I suspect the 16LA loader bucket strength issue was an engineering tradeoff with the light-duty buckets being for folks who want to clean out stalls and the heavy duty buckets for folks like us who occasionally need to clear brush or pop a tree. I agree with you that 30 lb difference in weight doesn't engender a lot of faith in the "HD" label.
JimI