CalG
Super Member
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2011
- Messages
- 9,380
- Location
- vermont
- Tractor
- Hurlimann 435, Fordson E27n, Bolens HT-23, Kubota B7200, Kubota B2601
I've been really pleased with the service I've received from the MacKisscs TPH185 chipper shredder that I purchased second hand years ago.
Just recently, I flipped the shredder hammers, they are on the fourth and last sharp corner, small stones are hard on them.
At any rate, I run the chipper on three of my smaller tractors, with two of them offering a hi speed pto rpm.
Those would be the Hurlimann, and the Kubota B7200. The Kubota B2601 does not have a high speed pto, and the E27n is a Cat 2 tractor so get little "attachment" service.
Again, at any rate, the rated input for the shredder is 540, BUT......
I find every function of the tool, both chipping (up to four inch, more than that I burn) and shredding all sorts of tree branches, fallen leaves, pruning, berry canes , and garden waste etc. are processed more readily, with less clogging at HIGHER pto input speed.
Say 800 RPM rather than full rated 1000 or the 540 alternative.
I've been running this way for over 7 years, and the bearings on the implement have not failed or even squeaked ;-) I do give each a pump of grease each season, but that's all.
The pivot shafts for the hammers showed no adverse wear when I did the hammer flip (48 hammers are a half days work!)
I can;t say much about the chipper knives, I try to keep them sharp, mostly, the high input spped keeps the chipper housing from clogging on stringy stuff.
What could go wrong?
Comments?
Just recently, I flipped the shredder hammers, they are on the fourth and last sharp corner, small stones are hard on them.
At any rate, I run the chipper on three of my smaller tractors, with two of them offering a hi speed pto rpm.
Those would be the Hurlimann, and the Kubota B7200. The Kubota B2601 does not have a high speed pto, and the E27n is a Cat 2 tractor so get little "attachment" service.
Again, at any rate, the rated input for the shredder is 540, BUT......
I find every function of the tool, both chipping (up to four inch, more than that I burn) and shredding all sorts of tree branches, fallen leaves, pruning, berry canes , and garden waste etc. are processed more readily, with less clogging at HIGHER pto input speed.
Say 800 RPM rather than full rated 1000 or the 540 alternative.
I've been running this way for over 7 years, and the bearings on the implement have not failed or even squeaked ;-) I do give each a pump of grease each season, but that's all.
The pivot shafts for the hammers showed no adverse wear when I did the hammer flip (48 hammers are a half days work!)
I can;t say much about the chipper knives, I try to keep them sharp, mostly, the high input spped keeps the chipper housing from clogging on stringy stuff.
What could go wrong?
Comments?