Grumpycat
Veteran Member
Coal is good.
That ICE SUV can not be built without electricity from coal, and lithium, cobalt, and nickel for the electronics and alloy of metals.
Coal is good.
Meh.
True, but there are shades of a color. A battery charged from a network of mixed fuel sources including nukes and renewables is better than an ICE operating 100% from refined petroleum, before we even start arguing about net efficiencies, which are pretty terrible for the ICE auto.Nothing is "green".
Get over it.
True, but there are shades of a color. A battery charged from a network of mixed fuel sources including nukes and renewables is better than an ICE operating 100% from refined petroleum, before we even start arguing about net efficiencies, which are pretty terrible for the ICE auto.
Furthermore, where you locate the latrine matters. ICE air pollution in a dense city may impact public health more than lithium mining in remote locations. All things worth consideration.
I don't choose my vehicles based on environmental impact, in fact most might accuse me of just the opposite, but I won't deny BEV's have way less atmospheric impact than ICE's for those living on our highly-populated coasts. I don't care enough to put my money where my mouth is, but I also won't pretend that BEV's are somehow worse than ICE's... they're not.
I am not sure any of those facts are entirely honest or accurate. Yes, BEV's do spectacularly go up in flames, but not as often as ICE's. It's more spectacular and difficult to extinguish when they do, but we still see more ICE fires than BEV's.The impact from mining the lithium is pretty considerable. The impact from making a 600 pound ICE engine is pretty minuscule compared to the billions of tons of steel in production anyway. The ice engine is almost completely recyclable where the battery not so much. The rate of ice vehicles bursting into flames which causes a lot of environmental damage is pretty low. Electric vehicles make a hobby of bursting into flames.
Agreed. I'm arguing on the point of truth and honesty. Environmental impact does not weigh at all into my actual vehicle purchasing decision. I just don't like people who lie or pretend to believe half-truths for the sake of justifying their decisions.I am one of those "entitled white dudes". When buying a vehicle, the impact on the environment is not even a passing thought I don't care... Getting the task done in comfort and without drama comes first, then reliability/serviceability, then fuel economy.
I am not sure any of those facts are entirely honest or accurate. Yes, BEV's do spectacularly go up in flames, but not as often as ICE's. It's more spectacular and difficult to extinguish when they do, but we still see more ICE fires than BEV's.
And why couch the impact from making an ICE engine in "compared to the billions of tons of steel in production anyway"? That's like justifying peeing in the pool, just because someone else has already done it.
Recyclability? Electric motors are mostly copper and iron by weight, both highly recyclable. Also let's not forget to include the mass of non-recyclable fuel consumed by each vehicle during its lifetime... which far-outweighs any of the hardware involved.
Agreed. I'm arguing on the point of truth and honesty. Environmental impact does not weigh at all into my actual vehicle purchasing decision. I just don't like people who lie or pretend to believe half-truths for the sake of justifying their decisions.
ICE's are bad for the environment, on the whole worse than BEV's. Now get over it, and go drive whatever you want.![]()
Oh, it is OK if we are already doing it and have for a long time. Got it.The impact from mining the lithium is pretty considerable. The impact from making a 600 pound ICE engine is pretty minuscule compared to the billions of tons of steel in production anyway.
Not true. Nothing is consumed in a lithium battery. A worn out battery is a richer source of ore than virgin from a mine.The ice engine is almost completely recyclable where the battery not so much.
Not true. The per-million rate of ICE spontaneous combustion is greater than for EV.The rate of ice vehicles bursting into flames which causes a lot of environmental damage is pretty low.
Only because it is new and gets attention. Not because the rate of fires, which is less than that of ICE.Electric vehicles make a hobby of bursting into flames.
The Ice engine can be in service for decades with minimal repairs.
How frequently is that? No generalities here, you stated point blank, "more frequently". My 2013 Tesla battery had 93% of it's original capacity after 10 years. How frequently? Elon Musk has stated they expect Model 3 and Y batteries to last 300,000 to 500,000 miles.The batteries need complete replacement at considerable cost much more frequently.
Nobody here cares. Nobody but those dropping by to share their irrational hate of EVs.I am one of those "entitled white dudes". When buying a vehicle, the impact on the environment is not even a passing thought I don't care.