Not remotely true. The vast majority of universities are non-profit and have huge endowments. They are constantly building new stuff because they cannot make a profit they are 'reinvesting' rather than lowering costs. They also have broadened out to have full courses for things that are unnecessary or at best would warrant a free one-time lecture on the mall. They still lament to lawmakers that they need more. Like most bureaucracies, they bloat over time. The trimmings of academia, like tenure and paid sabbatical add to the unnecessary costs. Remember when there were colleges? Now, almost all of them are universities. Bigger, not better.Sad truth is these universities need the construct of loans to stay afloat and need to lobby to keep them
$100 a credit hour in a cheaper area to live for 60 hour associate at a community college or pay $3-500. Plus room.and board. To go to a university.
Wow, what a can o' worms that could open up.Just think how much cheaper an education would be if we didn't pay coaches $50M for short term contracts.
They must have changed the grant application. When my sons were entering college 10 years ago, the application form we filled out only asked for the adjusted income from the previous filing year.It uses both. My 4th kid is in her Sr year at Tech. All 4 kids had this issue. They use net wealth, essentially, to determine how much you can afford, not income.
Tuition rose as a direct result of an uptick in fed/state student loans. More money chasing the same quantity of 'education'. Simple supply and demand stuff. This has zero to do with inflation.
If the government has any interest in paying for education, it is in exchange for service like any other employer. One reason they could get military recruits was for GI Bill. Why bother with the risk and hassle of service if the country will give you a loan and not make you pay it back?
Can’t say… all 5 are in University now… 2 Freshman year at UC Davis and 2 soon to be graduating and 1 in the middle.They must have changed the grant application. When my sons were entering college 10 years ago, the application form we filled out only asked for the adjusted income from the previous filing year.
They must have changed the grant application. When my sons were entering college 10 years ago, the application form we filled out only asked for the adjusted income from the previous filing year.
Exactly my understanding and most intrusive in every sense…
For most of those bigger schools, the football program pays for itself and the rest of the athletic programs. For some, basketball is similar in that regard.
The schools with the biggest academic scholarships were all big in NCAA sports. 'Bama, OU, Kentucky all offered my kid a full ride (no athlete). Strictly on academics. That money was available because the athletic programs made so much money (and they needed to improve academic results for the school overall).
Didn’t used to be that process. But it’s been over 10 years since we did this.
While it is true that only about 25 programs show a profit on paper, that is for all of their NCAA sports. You also have to remember that a lot of it is accounting games as the school's are "non-profit". It also doesn't include the increased tuition revenue as successful programs attract more students. There is also a lot of hidden revenue. If Georgia, for example, sells shirts that just say "Georgia" without reference to the athletic teams, it is not considered sports revenue. But we can all figure out how many more shirts are sold because they have a good FB team.Few D-1 football teams are profitable. Fewer than you would think.
sports.usatoday.com
About the sports scholarships; Your not wrong But; one part your missing is the value of advertising a school gets. Let's take University of Maimi for instance; you have a very Small, private school, that frankly isn't rated highly; that the entire country has heard of, for 1 reason only, football. Notre Dame, same story; if it wasn't for football, it would be just some weird catholic college in the middle of nowhere. Saw a story, talking about 5he financial impact of Nick Saban, being something like $800M for Bama; the out of state enrollment has like tripled during his career.
I did my RN to BSN program in18 months through Western Governors University (WGU Texas). It was a totally online program. It cost me around $12,000.My 17 y/o son is looking at the loan stuff now. He is expecting to get 100% tuition paid from a state scholarship; BUT tuition is a relatively small portion of the expense of college. Wife had to talk to him and ask, exactly what are you planning? We are willing to keep you on the car insurance and cell phone plan, maybe help Some with books and all, but this is gonna be one you. He is wanting to go into nursing (BSN) and eventually to nurse anesthesiologist. Our advice was pretty simple; do community College to RN, then, self fund the rest; but he's hard headed and wants to go to a 4 year school. Wife and I don't feel an obligation (and don't really have the ability) to just pay for 'want to go to college'; and it's not our debt, so, you can advice all you want, but he's the one taking on the debt.
Wife still has a pretty decent bit of student loans she owes on, even though she got a Pell grant for tuition, but she went as an adult, and we used the loans to pay for day care, mortgage, ect, while she was in nursing school.
One of my younger son's middle-school opponents plays DL for Notre Dame.No.
Notre Dame also has excellent mens basketball, mens lacrosse and other sports.
They compete at the highest level with the best in the country at almost everything, not just football.
Maybe what you should have said is “if it wasnt for sports, it would be just some weird catholic college in the middle of nowhere”.
Also, why is it “weird” to be a Catholic college?