I never said I agreed with tearing them out. I was just showing that it's not just the 'left coast' where this is happening. It's been happening all over the country for a century. The structures need costly maintenance after decades of use, and it's cheaper to tear them out and build new power plants than it is to repair/replace dams.
We had a small one about 10 miles north of us that was removed due to several reasons. Maintenance on the dam structure itself was getting expensive and poses an insurance liability to the company that owned it. The minimal amount of electricity it generated made it not worth (to them) the upkeep.
It completely blocked any fish migration, as it had no usable fish ladder as well, but that wasn't the driving force. No one cares about walleye and sucker migration. Now it's open to salmon and trout from Lake Michigan, so it'll be a while before any measurement of economic impact that fishery will have on that stretch of that river.
I thought they should have kept it.
Here in our town, there's a wide dam with only about a 13 foot drop. It drove the local economy for quite awhile with water powered machinery from a raceway on the east side of the river. Then they installed a hydroelectric plant on the west side of the river, and drove the machinery with electricity instead of water power, and filled in the east raceway that powered those industries with water. With electricity, businesses were no longer tied to the riverfront for power. Oliver plow works, Studebaker, Singer Sewing Machines, etc... all located SW of town and used electric power from that river, as well as their own coal powered steam and electric plants.
For that matter, my father worked in that power plant after high school while attending Notre Dame until WWII broke out.
They stopped producing electric power from that dam back in the late 60's or early 70's as I recall, and removed the power house (the implosion was a fiasco).
In the early 80s they dug out the east race, put a dam at the head end, and made a nice whitewater course. The city had plans and a permit to install a hydroelectric plant at those headwaters. They never did it. A few years ago, just before the permit was to expire, the city transferred it to Notre Dame, and they built a pretty unique hydroelectric plant there. The cosmetics are just finishing up this summer, but the plant went operational last year and provides about 7% of the university's electric needs.
From the wiki page on this river...
"There are 190 dams in the St. Joseph River watershed, and 17 on the river mainstem.
[7] Most of these dams block fish passage, although fish ladders constructed on the lower dams allow
salmonine passage as far as the Twin Branch Dam in
Mishawaka, Indiana. But, the fish ladders are not adequate for many native species, such as
sturgeon, and the dams tend to be built on the higher gradient portions of the river, which are the most critical river habitats for fish spawning.
[8]"
So, there's only 5 functioning fish ladders out of 190 dams on this river system.