5030
Rest in Peace
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2003
- Messages
- 28,967
- Location
- SE Michigan in the middle of nowhere
- Tractor
- Kubota M9000 HDCC3 M9000 HDC
The 8.7% increase don't even cover the cost of inflation and what it's doing to your spending power.
Sorry Roy, maybe I wasn't clear. Wasn't referencing SS with that statement, it was the relief checks and other inflation fighting measures that do exactly the opposite.Social Security isn't "free money". We're taxed on it all our working lives.
That said, SS should be strictly applied for people who paid in... not for any other recipients
Too true, and with the "administrative costs" of managing SS the government is literally making itself a self licking ice cream cone with that money.Nothing is free from the gummit, nothing. Far as SS goes, you paid into it with no choice and it's your money you are getting back, not theirs. It's a forced 'savings' account, nothing more, even though politicians robbed the fund for money which, is typical of politicians.
Good stuff.Choosing when to collect SS is a complex decision that each person must make based on their circumstances. There are a few additional considerations I have not yet seen here:
1. The comparisons of whether to "draw early" or "wait until 70" are not accurate, in my opinion. Because they presume the money drawn early is spent with no return or residual value. But what if you use the early-drawn money to buy tangible goods, like a tractor, land, or a rental property? Or, more simply, invest the early-drawn money. Calculate a typical return on that, and it moves the decision more toward drawing early.
2. If you wait to draw, but die before starting to draw, your family loses all the value that would have been added to the size of the estate they will divide up.
3. For me, the crossover point was age 84. At age 84. I would have drawn exactly the same amount regardless of which path I chose.
A very skilled investment advisor once counseled this on drawing SS: "It's counter-intuitive. If you don't need the money for monthly expenses, you should start drawing it early. But if you do need the money for monthly expenses, you should wait as long as possible, up to age 70."
Roll That Dice! By the way check out the obits - how many were 80 plus and how many were under 80. Social Security loves for people to work until they fall over. It eases the burden on those they send a check to every month.That is all factored into the math with the break even point...
Correction - The money you paid in is not yours. It did not go into a savings account for you. The money paid into SS today is paid out to people that are receiving SS / Disability today. Your contributions to SS comes with a promise that when you retire the people currently paying in at that time will contribute so you can receive a check.Nothing is free from the gummit, nothing. Far as SS goes, you paid into it with no choice and it's your money you are getting back, not theirs. It's a forced 'savings' account, nothing more, even though politicians robbed the fund for money which, is typical of politicians.
And what planet do you live on where the rich would pay into SS?If they made SS optional no one but the rich would pay into it.
Don't worry Kenny it's already spent. It's kind of like leaving $$$$ for your beneficiaries. Most of the time they already have a plan when you croaked. Just make sure they have a copy of your Will and they'l take care of it.While my break even is 78 by starting at 70 my COLA $$$ is much greater than had I signed up at 62 or 66. If I die in the next 6 years you guys can fight over what I left on the table.![]()
Does everyone pay Social Security tax?And what planet do you live on where the rich would pay into SS?
That is why I feel good about paying income taxes on my social security collections.Don't worry Kenny it's already spent. It's kind of like leaving $$$$ for your beneficiaries. Most of the time they already have a plan when you croaked. Just make sure they have a copy of your Will and they'l take care of it.
With SS every dollar paid in today is spent on someone receiving a SS check today.
I took the statement– is required to pay Social Security
to indicate it would not be required, the rich would put their money elsewhere.If they made SS optional no one but the rich would pay into it.
I disagree to a point. You paid into it with no choice so that makes it a forced 'savings account' for those that pay into it.Correction - The money you paid in is not yours. It did not go into a savings account for you. The money paid into SS today is paid out to people that are receiving SS / Disability today. Your contributions to SS comes with a promise that when you retire the people currently paying in at that time will contribute so you can receive a check.
It's a basic welfare system for the old and disabled. People that earn an income pay into SS so old and disable get a check to buy food, etc.
If they made SS optional no one but the rich would pay into it. Old and disable people would have to have a 'go fun me' page on facebook just to keep from starving.
I don't agree with this. I'd agree with "most" but not "nearly every ..."Nearly every American worker – as well as their employer – is required to pay Social Security and Medicare taxes,
Are you thinking of increasing SS payout on retirement to these who in 2023 be paying like $1800 more in SS taxes?No SS tax is collected when earned income is over $147K this year. Next year the paid-up point will be $160K.
Remove the cap and SS will be solvent for a long time.