etpm
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2021
- Messages
- 2,277
- Location
- Whidbey Island, WA
- Tractor
- Yanmar YM2310, Honda H5013, Case 580 CK, Ford 9N
I have been looking at the latest images from the James Webb telescope. The images, compared to images taken by other telescopes at similar frequencies, are spectacular. Another thing to consider is that all the imaging done by this telescope and others run by NASA is that all the imaging is available to everybody. I'm pretty sure all the raw data is as well.
Of note concerning the images is our perception of light. Often times astronomers and other scientists speak of "optical" light. They mean light that the human eye can see. When we look at something we see a large range of colors. However, when the actual span of frequencies of optical light is compared to the span of frequencies of the electromagnetic radiation spectrum it is tiny. Even though the James Webb telescope is "only" looking at infrared light the actual frequency range is quite large. And when we see images that are only in shades of red they are false colors. The telescope is seeing light that our eyes cannot see. So showing the images in just shades of red gives us a false idea of what the telescope is really seeing. If our eyes could only see in frequencies above ultra violet then a telescope that could only see the light we see now would also show images that were shades of "red", red being the color of light that is of lower frequency than whatever light you are able to see. I expect that when the folks at NASA start assigning colors we can see to the various frequencies that the Webb telescope can see we will be truly amazed at the images. Comparing the images shown so far to the "optical" images coming from the Hubble telescope gives us a false idea of the scope and depth of the light that the James Webb telescope is seeing. It makes the Webb 'scope images seem monochrome when they are anything but monochrome. Lower frequencies of light penetrate dust and gas that block optical light. So the Webb 'scope can and will be seeing objects that Hubble can't see.
The science that the James Webb telescope is going to be doing is so worth it and the knowledge it will add to humanity will be great. Great in volume and value.
Eric
Of note concerning the images is our perception of light. Often times astronomers and other scientists speak of "optical" light. They mean light that the human eye can see. When we look at something we see a large range of colors. However, when the actual span of frequencies of optical light is compared to the span of frequencies of the electromagnetic radiation spectrum it is tiny. Even though the James Webb telescope is "only" looking at infrared light the actual frequency range is quite large. And when we see images that are only in shades of red they are false colors. The telescope is seeing light that our eyes cannot see. So showing the images in just shades of red gives us a false idea of what the telescope is really seeing. If our eyes could only see in frequencies above ultra violet then a telescope that could only see the light we see now would also show images that were shades of "red", red being the color of light that is of lower frequency than whatever light you are able to see. I expect that when the folks at NASA start assigning colors we can see to the various frequencies that the Webb telescope can see we will be truly amazed at the images. Comparing the images shown so far to the "optical" images coming from the Hubble telescope gives us a false idea of the scope and depth of the light that the James Webb telescope is seeing. It makes the Webb 'scope images seem monochrome when they are anything but monochrome. Lower frequencies of light penetrate dust and gas that block optical light. So the Webb 'scope can and will be seeing objects that Hubble can't see.
The science that the James Webb telescope is going to be doing is so worth it and the knowledge it will add to humanity will be great. Great in volume and value.
Eric
Last edited: