Cahaba Valley Farm
Veteran Member
The problem I have found in the Kubota world is they don't offer a premium grade tractor in the medium frame size. Their medium frame size tractors are a crudely built bucket of bolts.There are a ton of folks here with the same comments, mostly that reflect “going bigger” on HP is usually the the wisest choice.
I was in your exact position 2 years ago. A newbie with NO tractor experience and questioning HP and Frame size.
My main goal was to NOT be unhappy with either my frame or HP choice 2 or fewer years down the road after some experience in the seat.
I knew I wanted to finish mow… which was basically placing a top end on frame size. So I maxed that out. I have found in 1.5 years that I’m on the heavy end of that limit and do some minimal damage every time I finish mow with a 72” finish mower on the 3 point.
Having said that… that single issue is the only negative for hitting the largest frame size I could possibly go and still be able to finish mow due to tractor weight and width. (Although there is still a negative in locking me out of smaller lots that I just can’t justify using the tractor on -but again for my properties it’s working.
Next, onto HP.
My initial choice was aKubota L2501… that’s what I knew I could safely finish mow just about anything with and still have something left to do satisfying work with a small backhoe, FEL, and a few implements. I didn’t see much in the way of ground based implements (bottom plows) in my future so I opted for lighter (smaller frame size) and sans emissions (25 or below).
Having been told that I should always go a frame size higher, after the L2501 I moved up a full frame size to the Kubota MX4800 open station. A massive move/change and added limitation for finish mowing, probably too big, but I didn’t want to short myself on other more weight based activities like the size of the FEL and Backhoe. So I opted to upsize at the cost of smaller lot size issues for the finish mower. The HP of approximately 50 compared to 25 for the smaller frame size had no impact on my choice. It was just the frame size alone that kicked me up into the higher HP (doubled).
The day I signed the paperwork I decided to sit in a grand L3560. I liked it. I liked the comfort, I liked the roominess, and I liked that it was about the same frame size as the MX4800 but with a cab, and a ton of features that would required much less of a training curve to get comfortable with the equipment.
So now I was basically up to the extreme max of finish mowing on the frame size of the Kubota L3560, and although I did have a 40 and a 60 HP option… I opted for the 35 HP for a number of reasons:
I wasn’t looking at major ground contact work.
PTO requirements were only finish mowing and possibly tilling/brush hog work. So I could give up a bit of HP to keep from growing the frame size a small amount yet again to step into a 40 or 60HP L4060 or L6060 (which would have definitely pushed me out of the finish mowing arena as far as frame size!)
Since mostly the backhoe and FEL work and finish mowing was my gig, I stuck with the L3560.
Today… if I had the choice again, I would have taken the L4060 just to have some HP overhead available as an “in case” option.
But that model wasn’t available with cab in a “limited edition” that saved me about $2500 over the regular version of the same tractor…. So I made the best possible choice for me, at the time, and with the biggest possible frame size that would fit my needs.
The HP didn’t take as much of the decision process over the other factors based on my expectations of future use (minimal ground contact and extended FEL and backhoe use). I did get the largest BH and FEL available for the model of choice, and I’m completely happy with the experience of the equip going on 1.5 years and almost 450 hours.
Good luck!!
Last edited: