https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EQi7jarUYAAV_EH?format=jpg&name=900x900
Harvard Professor, BU Researcher Among 3 Arrested For Ties To China CBS Boston
Interesting stuff. Looks highly likely it is a bio weapon. And it does matter...
That does look interesting. Doesn't surprise me though. Universities in the USA are hotbeds of communist ideology. Seems natural for them to team up with our Chicom friends.
That does look interesting. Doesn't surprise me though. Universities in the USA are hotbeds of communist ideology. Seems natural for them to team up with our Chicom friends.
Up here in the People's Republic Of Mass...we have several America hating college campuses located in Boston/Cambridge..
If you like that...
Here is a look into the WHO
Coronavirus: How WHO Corruption Helped It Spread - YouTube
I've been watching the Ebola outbreak in Africa since 2018, specifically the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) where it borders Uganda. The WHO has said the same thing there about not limiting international travel or trade. Uganda imposed restrictions anyway and has been mostly free of the ravages of the disease. When a case does show up, they are quick to contain it and all the associated people. It turns out that in those cases the person crossed the border in a place the government didn't know about. (As in illegal alien status). In that disease outbreak, WHO was slow to do anything and claimed that it needed more money. Several nations ignored WHO and provided the help they could which did far more to control Ebola than anything WHO did. I don't know if there is any corruption, but it does seem that the organization is not doing what it was originally chartered to do.If you like that...
Here is a look into the WHO
Coronavirus: How WHO Corruption Helped It Spread - YouTube
China with its long recorded history thinks in terms of long term strategies. There's no doubt they are re-colonizing Africa to their own advantage duplicating what Europeans did ~300 years ago.And as for China buying into Ethopia, yes, they're doing it and setting themselves up for a permanent presence in Africa. Even Namibia on the opposite side of Africa from Ethopia is trying to contend with the Chinese and has sent several high ranking officials home. Keep in mind that Africa has a lot of natural resources and China is poised to be the primary controller of these resources.
2629 / 79774 = 3% The 9% on that worldometer website excludes "active cases"
Coronavirus Live Updates: U.S. Officials Warn Americans to Brace for Likely Outbreak - The New York Times
You can't guess the death rate yet. At this point it's pure speculation, there's just not enough info.
I've been watching the Ebola outbreak in Africa since 2018, specifically the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) where it borders Uganda. The WHO has said the same thing there about not limiting international travel or trade. Uganda imposed restrictions anyway and has been mostly free of the ravages of the disease. When a case does show up, they are quick to contain it and all the associated people. It turns out that in those cases the person crossed the border in a place the government didn't know about. (As in illegal alien status). In that disease outbreak, WHO was slow to do anything and claimed that it needed more money. Several nations ignored WHO and provided the help they could which did far more to control Ebola than anything WHO did. I don't know if there is any corruption, but it does seem that the organization is not doing what it was originally chartered to do.
And as for China buying into Ethopia, yes, they're doing it and setting themselves up for a permanent presence in Africa. Even Namibia on the opposite side of Africa from Ethopia is trying to contend with the Chinese and has sent several high ranking officials home. Keep in mind that Africa has a lot of natural resources and China is poised to be the primary controller of these resources.
Can't guess the death rate? Huh? Whose guessing? of the 30,620 closed cases, 27,909 (91%) survived (some with lifelong scarring of the lungs) and 2,711 (9%) died as a result of contracting the Coronavirus.
There is no guesswork here, this is math. How big of a distribution of closed cases do you think we need before we can draw a conclusion on the percentage of fatalities?
The problem is the wide range of severity with this illness compared to previous viruses. Most in the past have left little doubt when someone had a possible case, and had to be tested. This current virus affects many in such a minor way, with a mild sore throat for example, that they never get tested or request treatment. But they continue to spread to others. So we count those we test, and those severely sick or who have died. How will we every know a true number of those infected? The South Korea test might be the best so far, if they test and monitor the entire group.