Sad day for this farmer

/ Sad day for this farmer #61  
Everyone in this conversation that makes their living farming without outside income speak up?
I'm not one of them but I know 2. They both have gotten very large (like 1,000 acres or more). One milks a pile of cows (600+ I think) and his entire feed crop is financed (such that the bank is knocking on the door before the combines are in the shed). The other is similar but does have some cushion that permits him to hold excess grain to wait for the right time to sell.
 
/ Sad day for this farmer #62  
I'm not one of them but I know 2. They both have gotten very large (like 1,000 acres or more). One milks a pile of cows (600+ I think) and his entire feed crop is financed (such that the bank is knocking on the door before the combines are in the shed). The other is similar but does have some cushion that permits him to hold excess grain to wait for the right time to sell.

That's my experiences as well. Good friend farms 20K acres of corn/soybeans.

My point with the question is we all have firm beliefs in what works. I don't think anyone that has posted on this thread fits my question. We'll see. :)
 
/ Sad day for this farmer #63  
retired and just help my brother out as needed, he still actively farms got rid of the milk cows 5 years ago and now beef both grassfed and grain feed
 
/ Sad day for this farmer #64  
Everyone in this conversation that makes their living farming without outside income speak up?
What does that have to do with this discussion?
 
/ Sad day for this farmer #65  
What does that have to do with this discussion?

None of us truly know whats best for the industry or what it takes to survive. All we have is our perceptions.
 
/ Sad day for this farmer #66  
None of us truly know whats best for the industry or what it takes to survive. All we have is our perceptions.
Agree...

I grew up on a farm, but everyone i know that farmed also worked another job for their living. I live amoung some big farms, even if the husband farms full time, wife works outside to carry insurance, if nothing else.
 
/ Sad day for this farmer #67  
Agree...

I grew up on a farm, but everyone i know that farmed also worked another job for their living. I live amoung some big farms, even if the husband farms full time, wife works outside to carry insurance, if nothing else.

Used to be around here, farmers would go to work for the county in the winter, they got a paycheck, insurance, and even a pension. That died off years ago, cost too much. A lot of farm wives seem to be teachers, they used to get good bennies. Not so much anymore. I have a small place, just 10 acres, but I don't see younger people having much interest in our rural lifestyle, small farms or even tractors!!!! Most of the folks I used to work with moved to condos when they retired, little maintenance, and they can leave anytime. Another problem is the lack of high speed internet is many areas.
 
/ Sad day for this farmer #68  
I have a friend, who is a retired dairy farmer. He spends a lot of time going to farm tours, reading up on the industry. His family got out of milking about ten years ago, and they crop farm now. He feels there are 2 marketing issues:

Competition from south America, mainly Brazil and Argentina. They have the land available for expansion, and they are improving their infrastructure, something that was lacking. The Chinese might help them with those problems.

Renewable fuel standards. If they get thrown out, the 30% of the corn crop that is going to ethanol will need a new home...

Over time, the value of farm commodities will approach cost?
 
/ Sad day for this farmer #69  
I reside right next to the county in question. Our farming community is inherited. One right next door to me just sold for a million dollars. Old farm house, needs renovation, one hundred acres. Has not seen a cow or crop for ten years. A richer clientele is buying up these properties for either development, or peace and quiet.

The older farmers, and I do mean old, are augmenting incomes with road side stands and subscription services. Most of their kids have gone other ways, and speaking with the elders, they say it was a good choice. The kids that do come in now, are buying ten to fifty acre lots and attempting organics, craft brews or wineries. I don't see how those functions will keep enough cash flow coming in, but they are doing what they are doing. Good for them.

I myself had dreams of farming when I purchase my place. The mortgage note sent me in another direction. Even without the note I just can't see dairy/cows or crops on my place sustaining me into retirement. The money is just not there.
 
/ Sad day for this farmer #70  
None of us truly know whats best for the industry or what it takes to survive. All we have is our perceptions.

This is correct, but if it takes a .gov subsidy to 'survive' then that really isn't surviving is it. It is charity. I grew up a farmer and rancher. Grandpa purchased 420ac in SW Colorado and we worked about 400 more. All dry land, but back in the 70s and 80s, we received enough rain to make it work. Of that 400ac, all of it has been put into CRP. After I left for college and my Grandpa got older, he quite the farming and just maintained beef. Rather than get another tenant farmer, the owners recognized they could make more money by having .gov pay them NOT to farm. My Grandpa was disgusted as am I to this day. Everyone has the Right to do what they will with their land, but the essence is the owners got money out of my Grandpa either from crops or his taxes.

I absolutely abhor .gov subsidies as they manipulate our activities to the degree that we find we cannot function without them. And all the while, we gripe about prices, the work, etc. But still cash those checks. I find the same with .gov required 'laws' such as ethanol requirement in fuel. It artificially creates a 'business' that cannot survive without the law, regardless of whether the 'law' is of benefit or not. Then when the artificial propping of the industry is no longer sustainable, it crumbles and people once again blame others, although they were happy enough to enjoy the law when it was working in their favor.
 
/ Sad day for this farmer #71  
I have a friend, who is a retired dairy farmer. He spends a lot of time going to farm tours, reading up on the industry. His family got out of milking about ten years ago, and they crop farm now. He feels there are 2 marketing issues:

Competition from south America, mainly Brazil and Argentina. They have the land available for expansion, and they are improving their infrastructure, something that was lacking. The Chinese might help them with those problems.

Renewable fuel standards. If they get thrown out, the 30% of the corn crop that is going to ethanol will need a new home...

Over time, the value of farm commodities will approach cost?

I'm pretty sure we sent our technology to South America and taught them how to grow grain crops.

The percentage of grain going to ethanol has shrank. Even with governmental subsidies that industry can't survive. Iowa has shut down many of their plants. My Cousin farms near one. He still sells a lot of grain to them. It is reflected in their local grain prices which run about 30 cents a bushel higher than here. We are 170 miles apart.
 
/ Sad day for this farmer #72  
This is correct, but if it takes a .gov subsidy to 'survive' then that really isn't surviving is it. It is charity. I grew up a farmer and rancher. Grandpa purchased 420ac in SW Colorado and we worked about 400 more. All dry land, but back in the 70s and 80s, we received enough rain to make it work. Of that 400ac, all of it has been put into CRP. After I left for college and my Grandpa got older, he quite the farming and just maintained beef. Rather than get another tenant farmer, the owners recognized they could make more money by having .gov pay them NOT to farm. My Grandpa was disgusted as am I to this day. Everyone has the Right to do what they will with their land, but the essence is the owners got money out of my Grandpa either from crops or his taxes.

I absolutely abhor .gov subsidies as they manipulate our activities to the degree that we find we cannot function without them. And all the while, we gripe about prices, the work, etc. But still cash those checks. I find the same with .gov required 'laws' such as ethanol requirement in fuel. It artificially creates a 'business' that cannot survive without the law, regardless of whether the 'law' is of benefit or not. Then when the artificial propping of the industry is no longer sustainable, it crumbles and people once again blame others, although they were happy enough to enjoy the law when it was working in their favor.

I think we all live on subsidies one way or another.

In regards to CRP, I have 70 acres enrolled. It pays an average of $147 per acre. The land will cash rent for $125. Which do you recommend that I do? :)

You are correct, Americans are addicted to governmental involvement in everything. We are disappointed when they don't get involved. I believe wind energy is just as corrupt as ethanol in regards to lack of sustainment without help.

I believe if all governmental control was removed from farming it would dramatically change. Yield would plummet. Price would skyrocket. Result would be dramatic.

I am willing to struggle thru that to rid Agriculture of governmental control. I'm 100% positive that city dwellers are not.
 
/ Sad day for this farmer #73  
In regards to CRP, I have 70 acres enrolled. It pays an average of $147 per acre. The land will cash rent for $125. Which do you recommend that I do? :)

Oh, I agree... given the option it is easier to put it in CRP. However, that money isn't 'free' and comes from the massive Credit Card we are using.

I think there would be turmoil in prices in the short run. But I don't believe it would remain so. I think yields would stabilize at a 'USEFUL' level in which demand and supply coexisted in a true fashion. As it is now, yields are artificially high because .gov will buy it or make a law making everyone buy it (ethanol). I think the crap food we eat with the massive processing would disappear, because the extremely cheap substrate (corn, soybeans, and wheat) would increase in value and buying that 'frozen pizza' for $3 would turn into $12 and people would likely change their eating habits becoming healthier and decreasing the massive obesity burden on medicine. (That is going to be what breaks our medical system in the next 20yrs.)

Honestly, I think NOTHING but good would come of it... in the long run. But, you are correct, those who believe their food comes from a shelf not a farm would not be so keen on actually openly paying the true cost. They pay it now... but in the form of AG subsidies, health insurance, and interest payments on the debt.
 
/ Sad day for this farmer #74  
If this came about the small farmer would become extinct. Then huge conglomerates would control Agriculture. Yields would stabilize at the most profitable level.

My friend has told me several times he doesn't want to raise 200 bu corn and sell it for $3.50 a bushel equaling $700 per acre. He'd rather grow 50 bu corn and sell it for $14 a bushel equaling $700 per acre. His profit margin would double or possibly triple. So would the consumer cost for all products using corn including the meat we eat.

Without governmental controls that's where our yields and prices would be at today. And as you accurately stated, we would be healthier in the process. :)

He also states it costs $600 to grow an acre of corn not counting land costs. :(
 
/ Sad day for this farmer #75  
I think we all live on subsidies one way or another.

In regards to CRP, I have 70 acres enrolled. It pays an average of $147 per acre. The land will cash rent for $125. Which do you recommend that I do? :)

You are correct, Americans are addicted to governmental involvement in everything. We are disappointed when they don't get involved. I believe wind energy is just as corrupt as ethanol in regards to lack of sustainment without help.

I believe if all governmental control was removed from farming it would dramatically change. Yield would plummet. Price would skyrocket. Result would be dramatic.

I am willing to struggle thru that to rid Agriculture of governmental control. I'm 100% positive that city dwellers are not.

Keep it in CRP, manage for wildlife habitat, rent it out to a hunt club for $100-$200/acre. Let them stock the birds.
 
/ Sad day for this farmer #76  
Keep it in CRP, manage for wildlife habitat, rent it out to a hunt club for $100-$200/acre. Let them stock the birds.

Not allowed to rent the crp out. Could rent adjacent acres.
 
/ Sad day for this farmer #77  
I think we all live on subsidies one way or another.

In regards to CRP, I have 70 acres enrolled. It pays an average of $147 per acre. The land will cash rent for $125. Which do you recommend that I do? :)

You are correct, Americans are addicted to governmental involvement in everything. We are disappointed when they don't get involved. I believe wind energy is just as corrupt as ethanol in regards to lack of sustainment without help.

I believe if all governmental control was removed from farming it would dramatically change. Yield would plummet. Price would skyrocket. Result would be dramatic.

I am willing to struggle thru that to rid Agriculture of governmental control. I'm 100% positive that city dwellers are not.

Beef cattle and sheep ranchers do not have much in the way of subsidies - about the only area of Ag that is not subsidized, guaranteed, insured, or somehow protected by the government
 
/ Sad day for this farmer #78  
Not allowed to rent the crp out. Could rent adjacent acres.

I think that's just wording. Does your contract forbid leasing hunting rights? Renting ag land is a different thing. I haven't dealt with CRP in over 20 years, but back then they didn't force you to turn it into a game preserve.
 
/ Sad day for this farmer #79  
I think that's just wording. Does your contract forbid leasing hunting rights? Renting ag land is a different thing. I haven't dealt with CRP in over 20 years, but back then they didn't force you to turn it into a game preserve.

I've had land in CRP for 30 years. The rules have chamged a LOT. Biggest difference is with technology. Now USDA has a current view of your land without leaving the office. Maintenance requirements vary with the type of contract. Bob White Quail program requires brush piles and/or fallen trees on the plot. Pollinator program doesn't allow burning. Etc, etc. I'm not specifically positive about lease hunting. Monday I'll find out and report back.
 
 
Top